# [PATCH] http: accept https:// proxies again 4 messages from 2026-06-27 to 2026-06-28. Participants: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget, Junio C Hamano. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/65879 ## Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget, 2026-06-27 17:17 Subject: [PATCH] http: accept https:// proxies again Message-ID: ``` From: Johannes Schindelin Since 663d7abe07ea (http: reject unsupported proxy URL schemes, 2026-05-05), set_curl_proxy_type() returns 0 only for the "http" and SOCKS variants via dedicated early returns, and -1 for everything else. The "https" branch configures the CURL handle for HTTPS proxying but then falls through to the trailing `return -1` intended for unknown schemes, so the caller in get_curl_handle() treats a perfectly valid https:// proxy URL as unsupported and refuses to use it. Noticed while looking into a Coverity report against the same function; the unchecked curl_easy_setopt() return values it flags are orthogonal to this fix. Assisted-by: Opus 4.7 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin --- http: accept https:// proxies again Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2161%2Fdscho%2Ffix-bug-in-validate-proxy-url-scheme-v1 Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2161/dscho/fix-bug-in-validate-proxy-url-scheme-v1 Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2161 http.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/http.c b/http.c index 8e5a4d8bcf..8c0f831365 100644 --- a/http.c +++ b/http.c @@ -802,6 +802,8 @@ static int set_curl_proxy_type(CURL *result, const char *protocol) if (has_proxy_cert_password()) curl_easy_setopt(result, CURLOPT_PROXY_KEYPASSWD, proxy_cert_auth.password); + + return 0; } return -1; base-commit: 663d7abe07ea376c2657019a03297ae87037c993 -- gitgitgadget ``` ## Junio C Hamano, 2026-06-28 01:54 Subject: Re: [PATCH] http: accept https:// proxies again Message-ID: In-Reply-To: ``` "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" writes: > http.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/http.c b/http.c > index 8e5a4d8bcf..8c0f831365 100644 > --- a/http.c > +++ b/http.c > @@ -802,6 +802,8 @@ static int set_curl_proxy_type(CURL *result, const char *protocol) > if (has_proxy_cert_password()) > curl_easy_setopt(result, CURLOPT_PROXY_KEYPASSWD, > proxy_cert_auth.password); > + > + return 0; > } > > return -1; That lack of "return 0" is so glaringly obvious when you point it out like this patch does, and it is surprising it has been missed initially. From this function nothing returns an error anymore, and looking at the preimage of 663d7abe (http: reject unsupported proxy URL schemes, 2026-05-05) that is the source of the bug, the original did not do anything when the corresponding code did not find and set any proxy settings, either. So perhaps it is a better fix to make it just a function that returns void with early returns? Thanks. ``` ## Junio C Hamano, 2026-06-28 05:10 Subject: Re: [PATCH] http: accept https:// proxies again Message-ID: In-Reply-To: ``` Junio C Hamano writes: > From this function nothing returns an error anymore, and looking at > the preimage of 663d7abe (http: reject unsupported proxy URL > schemes, 2026-05-05) that is the source of the bug, the original did > not do anything when the corresponding code did not find and set any > proxy settings, either. > > So perhaps it is a better fix to make it just a function that > returns void with early returns? Nah, I was being stupid. Disregard the above. The whole point of 663d7abe was that we wanted to reject what we did not recognise, and we cannot do so without returning "good/bad" from that function. The bug was that we did recognise https:// but still returned -1 because of the bug, which the patch in the thread fixed. Thanks. ``` ## Junio C Hamano, 2026-06-28 22:27 Subject: Re: [PATCH] http: accept https:// proxies again Message-ID: In-Reply-To: ``` Junio C Hamano writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> From this function nothing returns an error anymore, and looking at >> the preimage of 663d7abe (http: reject unsupported proxy URL >> schemes, 2026-05-05) that is the source of the bug, the original did >> not do anything when the corresponding code did not find and set any >> proxy settings, either. >> >> So perhaps it is a better fix to make it just a function that >> returns void with early returns? > > Nah, I was being stupid. Disregard the above. > > The whole point of 663d7abe was that we wanted to reject what we did > not recognise, and we cannot do so without returning "good/bad" from > that function. The bug was that we did recognise https:// but still > returned -1 because of the bug, which the patch in the thread fixed. And as an important bugfix, this patch of course has been fast-tracked. I'll make sure we have it in 'master' before Git 2.55 gets tagged. Thanks. ```