{"thread":{"id":"65689","subject":"[PATCH] test-lib: fix typo in test summary message","startedAt":"2026-05-25T05:36:37Z","lastAt":"2026-06-01T08:12:53Z","messageCount":2,"participants":["Amogh","Patrick Steinhardt"],"isPatch":true,"patchVersion":1,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"544030","messageId":"20260525053633.73153-1-amoghdambal1@gmail.com","threadId":"65689","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"[PATCH] test-lib: fix typo in test summary message","fromName":"Amogh","fromEmail":"amoghdambal1@gmail.com","sentAt":"2026-05-25T05:36:33Z","receivedAt":"2026-05-25T05:36:37Z","isPatch":true,"body":"There's a small typo (\"passin\", should be \"passing\") in the\nsummary/description message for t0000-basic. Even though this isn't a\nuser-facing string it should improve the developer experience + reduce\nconfusion when working on the codebase.\n---\n t/t0000-basic.sh | 2 +-\n 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)\n\ndiff --git a/t/t0000-basic.sh b/t/t0000-basic.sh\nindex 2b63e1c86c..9f6991a9ab 100755\n--- a/t/t0000-basic.sh\n+++ b/t/t0000-basic.sh\n@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ test_expect_success 'subtest: a passing TODO test' '\n \tEOF\n '\n \n-test_expect_success 'subtest: 2 TODO tests, one passin' '\n+test_expect_success 'subtest: 2 TODO tests, one passing' '\n \twrite_and_run_sub_test_lib_test_err partially-passing-todos <<-\\EOF &&\n \ttest_expect_failure \"pretend we have a known breakage\" \"false\"\n \ttest_expect_success \"pretend we have a passing test\" \"true\"\n-- \n2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)\n\n"},{"id":"544353","messageId":"ah0-_w2znxOPWmLU@pks.im","threadId":"65689","inReplyTo":"20260525053633.73153-1-amoghdambal1@gmail.com","subject":"Re: [PATCH] test-lib: fix typo in test summary message","fromName":"Patrick Steinhardt","fromEmail":"ps@pks.im","sentAt":"2026-06-01T08:12:47Z","receivedAt":"2026-06-01T08:12:53Z","isPatch":true,"body":"On Sun, May 24, 2026 at 10:36:33PM -0700, Amogh wrote:\n> There's a small typo (\"passin\", should be \"passing\") in the\n> summary/description message for t0000-basic. Even though this isn't a\n> user-facing string it should improve the developer experience + reduce\n> confusion when working on the codebase.\n\nI'd be surprised if this actually causes any confusion, so I feel like\nthe explanation is a bit lofty. But ultimately, one less typo is a good\nthing, so the change makes sense to me.\n\nYour patch is missing the \"Signed-off-by:\" trailer though.\n\nThanks!\n\nPatrick\n"}]}