{"thread":{"id":"59805","subject":"Draft of Git Rev News edition 99","startedAt":"2023-05-29T22:34:35Z","lastAt":"2023-06-02T10:20:13Z","messageCount":3,"participants":["Christian Couder","Bagas Sanjaya"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"477790","messageId":"CAP8UFD2zaEPKNj2SpgGQUyFRmNp24E-8n1O9K5Se9=OhXckxGQ@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"59805","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Draft of Git Rev News edition 99","fromName":"Christian Couder","fromEmail":"christian.couder@gmail.com","sentAt":"2023-05-29T22:34:17Z","receivedAt":"2023-05-29T22:34:35Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"christian.couder@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/208954?v=4"},"body":"Hi everyone!\n\nA draft of a new Git Rev News edition is available here:\n\n  https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-99.md\n\nEveryone is welcome to contribute in any section either by editing the\nabove page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on\nthis GitHub issue:\n\n  https://github.com/git/git.github.io/issues/643\n\nYou can also reply to this email.\n\nIn general all kinds of contributions, for example proofreading,\nsuggestions for articles or links, help on the issues in GitHub,\nvolunteering for being interviewed and so on, are very much\nappreciated.\n\nI tried to Cc everyone who appears in this edition, but maybe I missed\nsome people, sorry about that.\n\nJakub, Markus, Kaartic and I plan to publish this edition very late on\nWednesday May 31st.\n\nThanks,\nChristian.\n"},{"id":"477791","messageId":"ZHVM6dw4lIHjdLGw@debian.me","threadId":"59805","inReplyTo":"CAP8UFD2zaEPKNj2SpgGQUyFRmNp24E-8n1O9K5Se9=OhXckxGQ@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 99","fromName":"Bagas Sanjaya","fromEmail":"bagasdotme@gmail.com","sentAt":"2023-05-30T01:10:01Z","receivedAt":"2023-05-30T01:17:21Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"bagasdotme@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/40219486?v=4"},"body":"On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 12:34:17AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:\n> Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section either by editing the\n> above page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on\n> this GitHub issue:\n> \n>   https://github.com/git/git.github.io/issues/643\n> \n> You can also reply to this email.\n\nFrom the draft:\n\n> After some discussions between Peff, Phillip and Junio, Peff sent a version 3\n> of his patch series with small changes. Especially the new version makes sure\n> we reject timestamps that start with a character that we don't consider a\n> whitespace or a digit or the - character before using strtoumax(3) as this was\n> considered enough to avoid issues related to this function.\n\nI think it's odd to have second person (we) when the text is written in\nthird-person perspective. Thus, abouve should have been:\n\n> ... Especially in the new version, it made sure that timestamps that were\n> started with a character that wasn't considered as either a whitespace, a\n> digit, or - character, were rejected before using strtoumax(3) ...\n\nThanks.\n\n-- \nAn old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara\n"},{"id":"477929","messageId":"CAP8UFD3OptAe-98+Q=WJZkhPnNVY91N9+Mx5thZoa3ieOXShrg@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"59805","inReplyTo":"ZHVM6dw4lIHjdLGw@debian.me","subject":"Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 99","fromName":"Christian Couder","fromEmail":"christian.couder@gmail.com","sentAt":"2023-06-02T10:19:47Z","receivedAt":"2023-06-02T10:20:13Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"christian.couder@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/208954?v=4"},"body":"Hi Bagas,\n\nOn Tue, May 30, 2023 at 3:17 AM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote:\n\n> > After some discussions between Peff, Phillip and Junio, Peff sent a version 3\n> > of his patch series with small changes. Especially the new version makes sure\n> > we reject timestamps that start with a character that we don't consider a\n> > whitespace or a digit or the - character before using strtoumax(3) as this was\n> > considered enough to avoid issues related to this function.\n>\n> I think it's odd to have second person (we) when the text is written in\n\nI think \"we\" is the first person.\n\n> third-person perspective. Thus, abouve should have been:\n>\n> > ... Especially in the new version, it made sure that timestamps that were\n> > started with a character that wasn't considered as either a whitespace, a\n> > digit, or - character, were rejected before using strtoumax(3) ...\n>\n> Thanks.\n\nThanks for your suggestion and sorry for forgetting to take it into account.\n\nI must say that I think it's Ok to use \"we\" instead of \"the Git\ncommunity\" in Git Rev News. I think we have often taken this\nperspective before.\n\nBy the way, does someone knows why the announce of edition 99 doesn't\nseem to have appeared yet on https://lore.kernel.org/git/ :\n\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/git/?q=s%3A%22Git+Rev+News+edition+99%22\n\nwhile it appeared on https://public-inbox.org/git/ :\n\nhttps://public-inbox.org/git/CAP8UFD2MNFjEjrGVyj__d4f95nC=D7csKajYzdtMFkfXKmrixQ@mail.gmail.com/\n\nThanks!\n"}]}