{"thread":{"id":"59553","subject":"Decoration of \"other\" refs","startedAt":"2023-04-05T18:08:50Z","lastAt":"2023-04-05T18:08:50Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Andrew Cooper"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"474870","messageId":"b3c06daf-c059-5dea-7ddd-91149c9828ed@citrix.com","threadId":"59553","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Decoration of \"other\" refs","fromName":"Andrew Cooper","fromEmail":"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com","sentAt":"2023-04-05T18:07:55Z","receivedAt":"2023-04-05T18:08:50Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com","avatar":null},"body":"Hello,\n\nI have been trying to adjust the colours of log decoration, and I think\nthere's a gap in configurability.\n\nguilt creates refs/patches/$branch/$file.name for each applied patch,\nand there appears to be no way to colourise these.\n\nLooking at the source, it appears that in ref_namespace[], the\nconfiguration for the NOTES, PREFETCH and REWRITTEN namespaces also\ndon't specify a .decoration attribute, so will pick up a value of\nDECORATION_NONE.\n\nIt's probably not feasible to have configuration for arbitrary refs, but\ncouldn't DECORATION_NONE turn into DECORATION_OTHER instead, and have an\noption which could be customised to something other than white?\n\nThanks,\n\n~Andrew\n"}]}