{"thread":{"id":"57177","subject":"Bug using `fetch` with blank `-c` arguments to git","startedAt":"2022-01-04T12:37:28Z","lastAt":"2022-01-07T13:04:57Z","messageCount":9,"participants":["Adam Dinwoodie","Erik Cervin Edin","Bryan Turner","Patrick Steinhardt"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"445397","messageId":"CA+kUOak9_RLpdr9d4pQiwU=K42taCwhMdg5WkLP4GreQd4yWig@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"57177","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Bug using `fetch` with blank `-c` arguments to git","fromName":"Adam Dinwoodie","fromEmail":"adam@dinwoodie.org","sentAt":"2022-01-04T12:36:50Z","receivedAt":"2022-01-04T12:37:28Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"adam@dinwoodie.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1397507?v=4"},"body":"While investigating some issues with a different project, I discovered\nthe command `git -c config.helper= fetch` was working with the Debian\nstable version of Git (v2.30.2) but not with my local build\n(v2.34.1.428.gdcc0cd074f).\n\nSpecifically, I see the following output:\n\n$ ./git -c credential.helper= fetch\nerror: bogus format in GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS\nfatal: unable to parse command-line config\n\nInvestigating with `git bisect`, the change in behaviour seems to have\nbeen introduced in 1ff21c05ba (\"config: store \"git -c\" variables using\nmore robust format\", 2021-01-12).\n\nI see the same behaviour with `-c config.helper=`, `-c\ncore.autocrlf=`, `-c core.autocrlf` and `-c core.autocrlf=true`..\nNotably the behaviour does not affect all other git commands; `git -c\ncore.autocrlf= log -1` works as expected.\n\nI think this is a regression; I can't see any reason why these\ncommands shouldn't work.\n\nCuriously, I'm seeing this behaviour on both my Raspberry Pi OS and\nDebian Bullseye systems, but not my Cygwin systems. I've not yet tried\nto work out what the difference is there. In all cases, I was testing\nwith my own build, built with `make -j<num> configure && ./configure\n--prefix=$HOME/.local && make -j<num>`.\n"},{"id":"445426","messageId":"CA+JQ7M_tOu5ahQSPZk5Be10rY_NDOmqLWj9b1On=KW8Rq2mk2w@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"57177","inReplyTo":"CA+kUOak9_RLpdr9d4pQiwU=K42taCwhMdg5WkLP4GreQd4yWig@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Bug using `fetch` with blank `-c` arguments to git","fromName":"Erik Cervin Edin","fromEmail":"erik@cervined.in","sentAt":"2022-01-04T15:35:14Z","receivedAt":"2022-01-04T15:35:51Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"erik@cervined.in","avatar":null},"body":"Minor clarifications\n\nOn Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 3:48 PM Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org> wrote:\n>\n> While investigating some issues with a different project, I discovered\n> the command `git -c config.helper= fetch` was working with the Debian\n> ...\n> I see the same behaviour with `-c config.helper=`, `-c\ntypos for \"credential.helper\" ?\n\n> Notably the behaviour does not affect all other git commands; `git -c\n> core.autocrlf= log -1` works as expected.\nYou've only seen this with \"git fetch\"?\n"},{"id":"445427","messageId":"CA+kUOakd0HaPk7PGh+4L6753KnsVaykczy31=5vrG91iJkcOfw@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"57177","inReplyTo":"CA+JQ7M_tOu5ahQSPZk5Be10rY_NDOmqLWj9b1On=KW8Rq2mk2w@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Bug using `fetch` with blank `-c` arguments to git","fromName":"Adam Dinwoodie","fromEmail":"adam@dinwoodie.org","sentAt":"2022-01-04T16:15:25Z","receivedAt":"2022-01-04T16:16:04Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"adam@dinwoodie.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1397507?v=4"},"body":"On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 15:35, Erik Cervin Edin <erik@cervined.in> wrote:\n>\n> Minor clarifications\n>\n> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 3:48 PM Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org> wrote:\n> >\n> > While investigating some issues with a different project, I discovered\n> > the command `git -c config.helper= fetch` was working with the Debian\n> > ...\n> > I see the same behaviour with `-c config.helper=`, `-c\n> typos for \"credential.helper\" ?\n\n\"credential.helper\" was certainly what I'd intended, but I see the\nsame behaviour with both options.\n\n(I'd initially thought this was specifically due to the blank\nargument, hence the email subject which I clearly failed to update,\nbut it looks like the issue occurs when using `-c` to set a config\noption regardless of the option being set.)\n\n> > Notably the behaviour does not affect all other git commands; `git -c\n> > core.autocrlf= log -1` works as expected.\n> You've only seen this with \"git fetch\"?\n\nI've not tried to do any exhaustive testing, but I see this behaviour\nwith \"git fetch\", \"git pull\", \"git bisect\" and \"git submodule\"; I see\nthings apparently working as expected \"git blame\", \"git commit\", \"git\npush\", \"git reset\", \"git switch\" and \"git log\".\n"},{"id":"445428","messageId":"CA+JQ7M-1_sGSX31Fij4XwFcrBVFPrLFJCC-GdeDrEeGoPYEP_w@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"57177","inReplyTo":"CA+kUOakd0HaPk7PGh+4L6753KnsVaykczy31=5vrG91iJkcOfw@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Bug using `fetch` with blank `-c` arguments to git","fromName":"Erik Cervin Edin","fromEmail":"erik@cervined.in","sentAt":"2022-01-04T16:30:48Z","receivedAt":"2022-01-04T16:31:26Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"erik@cervined.in","avatar":null},"body":"On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 3:48 PM Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org> wrote:\n> Investigating with `git bisect`, the change in behaviour seems to have\n> been introduced in 1ff21c05ba (\"config: store \"git -c\" variables using\n> more robust format\", 2021-01-12).\nIf that's the case it should be present since v2.31.0\n\nI can't replicate in git version 2.34.1.windows.1\nBut that's MinGW based so if you don't see it in cygwin it's not a big surprise\n\nOn Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 5:16 PM Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org> wrote:\n> but it looks like the issue occurs when using `-c` to set a config\n> option regardless of the option being set.)\n:(\n"},{"id":"445464","messageId":"CAGyf7-HSia4pRs4FZ107v0jmP4k4Zfw5zJ-3Oz8UvF9oobczEw@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"57177","inReplyTo":"CA+kUOak9_RLpdr9d4pQiwU=K42taCwhMdg5WkLP4GreQd4yWig@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Bug using `fetch` with blank `-c` arguments to git","fromName":"Bryan Turner","fromEmail":"bturner@atlassian.com","sentAt":"2022-01-04T20:04:41Z","receivedAt":"2022-01-04T20:04:54Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"bturner@atlassian.com","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/16bcf3167981c1ef7c804e502642366d888a35b0d0b0a4ca01fdc442aa1acb1e?d=mp&s=160"},"body":"On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:37 AM Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org> wrote:\n>\n> While investigating some issues with a different project, I discovered\n> the command `git -c config.helper= fetch` was working with the Debian\n> stable version of Git (v2.30.2) but not with my local build\n> (v2.34.1.428.gdcc0cd074f).\n\nSince you're working with a locally-built Git, have you, by chance,\nactually _installed_ that build, or is it simply in the Git repository\nitself after running make?\n\nIf you haven't _installed_ your build, my guess is you might be\ngetting a mismatch wherein your _built_ Git, when it forks out\nsubprocesses, is triggering your _installed_ Git (which I assume you\nhave, and which I assume is not 2.34.1). Git compiles paths into\nitself to know where to find certain binaries, and if you run a\ncompiled-but-not-installed Git then those paths are \"wrong\". (I see\nadministrators do this fairly often when building Git from source to\nset up Bitbucket Server.)\n\nWhat does `./git --exec-path` print, when you run your 2.34.1 binary?\nAnd is that where, for example, the compiled 2.34.1 versions of things\nlike `git-remote-https` are?\n\nHope this helps,\nBryan\n\n>\n> Specifically, I see the following output:\n>\n> $ ./git -c credential.helper= fetch\n> error: bogus format in GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS\n> fatal: unable to parse command-line config\n>\n> Investigating with `git bisect`, the change in behaviour seems to have\n> been introduced in 1ff21c05ba (\"config: store \"git -c\" variables using\n> more robust format\", 2021-01-12).\n>\n> I see the same behaviour with `-c config.helper=`, `-c\n> core.autocrlf=`, `-c core.autocrlf` and `-c core.autocrlf=true`..\n> Notably the behaviour does not affect all other git commands; `git -c\n> core.autocrlf= log -1` works as expected.\n>\n> I think this is a regression; I can't see any reason why these\n> commands shouldn't work.\n>\n> Curiously, I'm seeing this behaviour on both my Raspberry Pi OS and\n> Debian Bullseye systems, but not my Cygwin systems. I've not yet tried\n> to work out what the difference is there. In all cases, I was testing\n> with my own build, built with `make -j<num> configure && ./configure\n> --prefix=$HOME/.local && make -j<num>`.\n"},{"id":"445473","messageId":"CA+kUOam-Dd-XUk0XaOfw4_rUTg=Ws7w5H=vZ=ZZeEo4XJfsVOg@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"57177","inReplyTo":"CAGyf7-HSia4pRs4FZ107v0jmP4k4Zfw5zJ-3Oz8UvF9oobczEw@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Bug using `fetch` with blank `-c` arguments to git","fromName":"Adam Dinwoodie","fromEmail":"adam@dinwoodie.org","sentAt":"2022-01-04T21:00:45Z","receivedAt":"2022-01-04T21:01:23Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"adam@dinwoodie.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1397507?v=4"},"body":"On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 20:04, Bryan Turner <bturner@atlassian.com> wrote:\n>\n> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:37 AM Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org> wrote:\n> >\n> > While investigating some issues with a different project, I discovered\n> > the command `git -c config.helper= fetch` was working with the Debian\n> > stable version of Git (v2.30.2) but not with my local build\n> > (v2.34.1.428.gdcc0cd074f).\n>\n> Since you're working with a locally-built Git, have you, by chance,\n> actually _installed_ that build, or is it simply in the Git repository\n> itself after running make?\n>\n> If you haven't _installed_ your build, my guess is you might be\n> getting a mismatch wherein your _built_ Git, when it forks out\n> subprocesses, is triggering your _installed_ Git (which I assume you\n> have, and which I assume is not 2.34.1). Git compiles paths into\n> itself to know where to find certain binaries, and if you run a\n> compiled-but-not-installed Git then those paths are \"wrong\". (I see\n> administrators do this fairly often when building Git from source to\n> set up Bitbucket Server.)\n>\n> What does `./git --exec-path` print, when you run your 2.34.1 binary?\n> And is that where, for example, the compiled 2.34.1 versions of things\n> like `git-remote-https` are?\n\nGood thoughts, but I initially hit this problem after having installed\nit; I reproduced it running Git from the working copy for ease of\nbisecting, but the problem definitely occurs using the compiled\nversion after installation. The below was collected after running\n`make install` (plus all the previously noted build commands,\nincluding running the configure script to specify the installation\npath) with the commit I identified as introducing the problem:\n\n```\n$ type git\ngit is hashed (/home/adam/.local/bin/git)\n\n$ which git\n/home/adam/.local/bin/git\n\n$ git --version\ngit version 2.29.2.372.g1ff21c05ba\n\n$ git --exec-path\n/home/adam/.local/libexec/git-core\n\n$ ls $(git --exec-path)/git $(git --exec-path)/git-remote-https\n/home/adam/.local/libexec/git-core/git\n/home/adam/.local/libexec/git-core/git-remote-https\n\n$ $(git --exec-path)/git --version\ngit version 2.29.2.372.g1ff21c05ba\n\n$ rm -rf tmp && git -c core.autocrlf=true clone git://github.com/git/git tmp\nCloning into 'tmp'...\nerror: bogus format in GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS\nfatal: unable to parse command-line config\n```\n\nFor the sake of double-checking, though, I just uninstalled the\nversion of Git in /usr/bin (after spending some time working out how\nto do that with apt, without also uninstalling dependencies I wanted\nto leave alone) and repeated the above commands, and got exactly the\nsame output.\n"},{"id":"445620","messageId":"CA+kUOakkd2j_-W9cmcJNQeRzYHim2K2s9ugj29OHDgnh4r1yGg@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"57177","inReplyTo":"CA+kUOam-Dd-XUk0XaOfw4_rUTg=Ws7w5H=vZ=ZZeEo4XJfsVOg@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Bug using `fetch` with blank `-c` arguments to git","fromName":"Adam Dinwoodie","fromEmail":"adam@dinwoodie.org","sentAt":"2022-01-06T10:11:14Z","receivedAt":"2022-01-06T10:11:53Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"adam@dinwoodie.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1397507?v=4"},"body":"On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 21:00, Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org> wrote:\n> <snip>\n> For the sake of double-checking, though, I just uninstalled the\n> version of Git in /usr/bin (after spending some time working out how\n> to do that with apt, without also uninstalling dependencies I wanted\n> to leave alone) and repeated the above commands, and got exactly the\n> same output.\n\nOn the off-chance anyone is following along at home: I've just\nattempted to reproduce this problem with a fresh Debian installation,\nand the problem does not reproduce. So there's clearly something odd\nabout my environments. I'm baffled about what it might be, but for now\nI'll keep investigating on my side.\n"},{"id":"445712","messageId":"Ydg3hE+ZcCq4qW9m@ncase","threadId":"57177","inReplyTo":"CA+kUOam-Dd-XUk0XaOfw4_rUTg=Ws7w5H=vZ=ZZeEo4XJfsVOg@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Bug using `fetch` with blank `-c` arguments to git","fromName":"Patrick Steinhardt","fromEmail":"ps@pks.im","sentAt":"2022-01-07T12:52:20Z","receivedAt":"2022-01-07T12:52:47Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"ps@pks.im","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4056630?v=4"},"body":"On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 09:00:45PM +0000, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:\n> On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 20:04, Bryan Turner <bturner@atlassian.com> wrote:\n> >\n> > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:37 AM Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org> wrote:\n> > >\n> > > While investigating some issues with a different project, I discovered\n> > > the command `git -c config.helper= fetch` was working with the Debian\n> > > stable version of Git (v2.30.2) but not with my local build\n> > > (v2.34.1.428.gdcc0cd074f).\n> >\n> > Since you're working with a locally-built Git, have you, by chance,\n> > actually _installed_ that build, or is it simply in the Git repository\n> > itself after running make?\n> >\n> > If you haven't _installed_ your build, my guess is you might be\n> > getting a mismatch wherein your _built_ Git, when it forks out\n> > subprocesses, is triggering your _installed_ Git (which I assume you\n> > have, and which I assume is not 2.34.1). Git compiles paths into\n> > itself to know where to find certain binaries, and if you run a\n> > compiled-but-not-installed Git then those paths are \"wrong\". (I see\n> > administrators do this fairly often when building Git from source to\n> > set up Bitbucket Server.)\n> >\n> > What does `./git --exec-path` print, when you run your 2.34.1 binary?\n> > And is that where, for example, the compiled 2.34.1 versions of things\n> > like `git-remote-https` are?\n> \n> Good thoughts, but I initially hit this problem after having installed\n> it; I reproduced it running Git from the working copy for ease of\n> bisecting, but the problem definitely occurs using the compiled\n> version after installation. The below was collected after running\n> `make install` (plus all the previously noted build commands,\n> including running the configure script to specify the installation\n> path) with the commit I identified as introducing the problem:\n> \n> ```\n> $ type git\n> git is hashed (/home/adam/.local/bin/git)\n> \n> $ which git\n> /home/adam/.local/bin/git\n> \n> $ git --version\n> git version 2.29.2.372.g1ff21c05ba\n> \n> $ git --exec-path\n> /home/adam/.local/libexec/git-core\n> \n> $ ls $(git --exec-path)/git $(git --exec-path)/git-remote-https\n> /home/adam/.local/libexec/git-core/git\n> /home/adam/.local/libexec/git-core/git-remote-https\n> \n> $ $(git --exec-path)/git --version\n> git version 2.29.2.372.g1ff21c05ba\n> \n> $ rm -rf tmp && git -c core.autocrlf=true clone git://github.com/git/git tmp\n> Cloning into 'tmp'...\n> error: bogus format in GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS\n> fatal: unable to parse command-line config\n> ```\n> \n> For the sake of double-checking, though, I just uninstalled the\n> version of Git in /usr/bin (after spending some time working out how\n> to do that with apt, without also uninstalling dependencies I wanted\n> to leave alone) and repeated the above commands, and got exactly the\n> same output.\n\nI cannot really reproduce this locally. But given that it happens on\nsome installations while it works alright on others my best guess is\nthat you're effectively running a \"mixed\" setup, where Git binaries of\none version execute Git binaries of a different version. The result\nwould be that they have different ways to encode GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS,\nwhere new versions use the more robust, quoted format, which older\nversions don't understand, or the other way round.\n\nIf my theory is correct, then I'm a bit on the edge to call this a bug.\nGit expects its binaries to all be of the same version, so running such\na mixed setup is only going to cause problems. This isn't only true for\ninternal variables like the one we have here, but we also introduce new\ncommand line switches and expect Git helpers to understand them without\nany fallback if an old binary was executed.\n\nYou may want to verify that the Git executables you have are indeed able\nto execute the correct auxiliary binaries as expected and that they all\nstem from the same Git version.\n\nPatrick\n"},{"id":"445718","messageId":"CA+kUOamrMn-K8P34AmASaiXJvPu5OgYTXf6Rqwmm2+hjd5644A@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"57177","inReplyTo":"Ydg3hE+ZcCq4qW9m@ncase","subject":"Re: Bug using `fetch` with blank `-c` arguments to git","fromName":"Adam Dinwoodie","fromEmail":"adam@dinwoodie.org","sentAt":"2022-01-07T13:04:19Z","receivedAt":"2022-01-07T13:04:57Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"adam@dinwoodie.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1397507?v=4"},"body":"On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 12:52, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:\n>\n> On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 09:00:45PM +0000, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:\n> > On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 20:04, Bryan Turner <bturner@atlassian.com> wrote:\n> > >\n> > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:37 AM Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org> wrote:\n> > > >\n> > > > While investigating some issues with a different project, I discovered\n> > > > the command `git -c config.helper= fetch` was working with the Debian\n> > > > stable version of Git (v2.30.2) but not with my local build\n> > > > (v2.34.1.428.gdcc0cd074f).\n> > >\n> > > Since you're working with a locally-built Git, have you, by chance,\n> > > actually _installed_ that build, or is it simply in the Git repository\n> > > itself after running make?\n> > >\n> > > If you haven't _installed_ your build, my guess is you might be\n> > > getting a mismatch wherein your _built_ Git, when it forks out\n> > > subprocesses, is triggering your _installed_ Git (which I assume you\n> > > have, and which I assume is not 2.34.1). Git compiles paths into\n> > > itself to know where to find certain binaries, and if you run a\n> > > compiled-but-not-installed Git then those paths are \"wrong\". (I see\n> > > administrators do this fairly often when building Git from source to\n> > > set up Bitbucket Server.)\n> > >\n> > > What does `./git --exec-path` print, when you run your 2.34.1 binary?\n> > > And is that where, for example, the compiled 2.34.1 versions of things\n> > > like `git-remote-https` are?\n> >\n> > Good thoughts, but I initially hit this problem after having installed\n> > it; I reproduced it running Git from the working copy for ease of\n> > bisecting, but the problem definitely occurs using the compiled\n> > version after installation. The below was collected after running\n> > `make install` (plus all the previously noted build commands,\n> > including running the configure script to specify the installation\n> > path) with the commit I identified as introducing the problem:\n> >\n> > ```\n> > $ type git\n> > git is hashed (/home/adam/.local/bin/git)\n> >\n> > $ which git\n> > /home/adam/.local/bin/git\n> >\n> > $ git --version\n> > git version 2.29.2.372.g1ff21c05ba\n> >\n> > $ git --exec-path\n> > /home/adam/.local/libexec/git-core\n> >\n> > $ ls $(git --exec-path)/git $(git --exec-path)/git-remote-https\n> > /home/adam/.local/libexec/git-core/git\n> > /home/adam/.local/libexec/git-core/git-remote-https\n> >\n> > $ $(git --exec-path)/git --version\n> > git version 2.29.2.372.g1ff21c05ba\n> >\n> > $ rm -rf tmp && git -c core.autocrlf=true clone git://github.com/git/git tmp\n> > Cloning into 'tmp'...\n> > error: bogus format in GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS\n> > fatal: unable to parse command-line config\n> > ```\n> >\n> > For the sake of double-checking, though, I just uninstalled the\n> > version of Git in /usr/bin (after spending some time working out how\n> > to do that with apt, without also uninstalling dependencies I wanted\n> > to leave alone) and repeated the above commands, and got exactly the\n> > same output.\n>\n> I cannot really reproduce this locally. But given that it happens on\n> some installations while it works alright on others my best guess is\n> that you're effectively running a \"mixed\" setup, where Git binaries of\n> one version execute Git binaries of a different version. The result\n> would be that they have different ways to encode GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS,\n> where new versions use the more robust, quoted format, which older\n> versions don't understand, or the other way round.\n\nAh, that makes a lot of sense, thank you! In particular, I hadn't\nquite put together that if different Git binaries compiled with code\nboth before and after this change attempted to communicate, they'd be\ndoing so using a mutually incompatible interface, and that would\nproduce this error.\n\n> If my theory is correct, then I'm a bit on the edge to call this a bug.\n> Git expects its binaries to all be of the same version, so running such\n> a mixed setup is only going to cause problems. This isn't only true for\n> internal variables like the one we have here, but we also introduce new\n> command line switches and expect Git helpers to understand them without\n> any fallback if an old binary was executed.\n>\n> You may want to verify that the Git executables you have are indeed able\n> to execute the correct auxiliary binaries as expected and that they all\n> stem from the same Git version.\n\nYes, that's very much the conclusion I'm coming to as well. As I\nunderstand things, it should be possible to have multiple Git\ninstallations at different versions on the same system, provided\nthey're all configured to find their libraries and executables in the\nright place, so I've not yet ruled out there being a bug here. But if\nthere is a bug, it'll be something related to how Git finds its\nlibraries and executables at runtime, rather than anything directly to\ndo with this change. And at this point I very strongly suspect I've\njust screwed up somewhere and there's no bug whatsoever.\n"}]}