{"thread":{"id":"55681","subject":"Re: [PATCH v2] packfile-uri.txt: fix blobPackfileUri description","startedAt":"2021-05-13T06:45:00Z","lastAt":"2021-05-13T06:45:00Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Teng Long"],"isPatch":true,"patchVersion":2,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"424426","messageId":"CADMgQSR=f0kAnX0Fat2vSpVaG62WX9VAkU0xNeN_hiDaHXu-eA@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"55681","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Re: [PATCH v2] packfile-uri.txt: fix blobPackfileUri description","fromName":"Teng Long","fromEmail":"dyroneteng@gmail.com","sentAt":"2021-05-13T06:44:45Z","receivedAt":"2021-05-13T06:45:00Z","isPatch":true,"sender":{"key":"dyroneteng@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7803958?v=4"},"body":"Junio C Hamano writes:\n\n>Yes.  Some people seem to omit the final response to reviewer\n>suggestions on the previous round and just send a revised patch, but\n>it is much nicer to cleanly conclude the review cycle for the\n>previous round with a separate response (it could just be \"yes,\n>you're right---I'll incorporate your suggestions in the next round,\n>thanks\") before starting a new cycle.\n\nIf I  send a new patch cycle, the \"--thread\"  argument seems\nto be recommended. This may be the reason why it is easier\nto understand when submitting a series of patches?\n\nI may try to use \"--thread\", but it may make this whole\npatch more confusing, sorry for that.\n"}]}