{"thread":{"id":"54843","subject":"git-gui patches","startedAt":"2020-12-17T18:14:17Z","lastAt":"2020-12-17T18:55:32Z","messageCount":2,"participants":["Stefan Haller","Pratyush Yadav"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"412493","messageId":"b76cf18c-91ff-342b-af26-7b2a67bd6d8a@haller-berlin.de","threadId":"54843","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"git-gui patches","fromName":"Stefan Haller","fromEmail":"stefan@haller-berlin.de","sentAt":"2020-12-17T18:07:48Z","receivedAt":"2020-12-17T18:14:17Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"stefan@haller-berlin.de","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1225667?v=4"},"body":"Hi Pratyush,\n\nI was wondering what your plans are for the git-gui patches that have\nbeen floating around in the past few weeks.\n\nThe most important one for me is this one:\n\n \n\nbecause it fixes a regression that was introduced in 2.29. I was hoping\nthat this could be included in 2.30 to fix the regression (but maybe\nthat's too late already).\n\nRelated (and actually on top of that one) is\n\n \n\nwhich I hope should also be uncontroversial. I think this is a\nconsiderable improvement, and would be happy to see this included.\n\n\nAnd then we have\n\n \n\nwhich you said you would apply, but I don't see this in your tree yet.\nJust wanted to make sure that this doesn't fall through the cracks.\n\nThanks,\nStefan\n"},{"id":"412494","messageId":"20201217185446.onap43u2fso5km2h@yadavpratyush.com","threadId":"54843","inReplyTo":"b76cf18c-91ff-342b-af26-7b2a67bd6d8a@haller-berlin.de","subject":"Re: git-gui patches","fromName":"Pratyush Yadav","fromEmail":"me@yadavpratyush.com","sentAt":"2020-12-17T18:54:46Z","receivedAt":"2020-12-17T18:55:32Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"me@yadavpratyush.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8817931?v=4"},"body":"Hi Stefan,\n\nOn 17/12/20 07:07PM, Stefan Haller wrote:\n> Hi Pratyush,\n> \n> I was wondering what your plans are for the git-gui patches that have\n> been floating around in the past few weeks.\n\nSorry for the inactivity recently. Have a lot going on at $DAYJOB.\n \n> The most important one for me is this one:\n> \n> 20201122133233.7077-1 serg.partizan@gmail.com/>\n> \n> because it fixes a regression that was introduced in 2.29. I was hoping\n> that this could be included in 2.30 to fix the regression (but maybe\n> that's too late already).\n\nI need to go through the entire chain and take a close look at it. If I \nhave no big objections, I'll merge it in in a few hours.\n\n> \n> Related (and actually on top of that one) is\n> \n> 20201124212333.80040-1-stefan@haller-berlin.de/>\n> \n> which I hope should also be uncontroversial. I think this is a\n> considerable improvement, and would be happy to see this included.\n\nThis one seems a bit more complicated. I should have reviewed this long \nago. I'll take a look at it today and see if it is good enough for a \nlate merge. If not let's target the next release.\n \n> \n> And then we have\n> \n> 20201122194537.41870-2-stefan@haller-berlin.de/>\n> \n> which you said you would apply, but I don't see this in your tree yet.\n> Just wanted to make sure that this doesn't fall through the cracks.\n\nThis one will go in. I have merged it locally but haven't pushed it out \nyet.\n \nThere is also the auto-rescan patch [0]. I am almost done with the \nfollow-up warning patch I promised. Will post it soon but that will also \nhave to wait till the next merge window unfortunately.\n\nThanks for all the work on git-gui :-)\n\n[0] https://lore.kernel.org/git/e691c62c-7fb2-6a7d-0f02-7c0ab021f738@haller-berlin.de/\n\n-- \nRegards,\nPratyush Yadav\n"}]}