{"thread":{"id":"48076","subject":"Draft of Git Rev News edition 37","startedAt":"2018-03-18T18:21:50Z","lastAt":"2018-03-30T18:56:38Z","messageCount":6,"participants":["Christian Couder","Jacob Keller","Johannes Schindelin"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"342109","messageId":"CAP8UFD35QP0jwQ22jfUaNgo92o3vG8bV5n=iYnmn1ichxndphg@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"48076","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Draft of Git Rev News edition 37","fromName":"Christian Couder","fromEmail":"christian.couder@gmail.com","sentAt":"2018-03-18T18:21:43Z","receivedAt":"2018-03-18T18:21:50Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"christian.couder@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/208954?v=4"},"body":"Hi,\n\nA draft of a new Git Rev News edition is available here:\n\n https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-37.md\n\nEveryone is welcome to contribute in any section either by editing the\nabove page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on\nthis GitHub issue:\n\n https://github.com/git/git.github.io/issues/279\n\nYou can also reply to this email.\n\nIn general all kinds of contribution, for example proofreading,\nsuggestions for articles or links, help on the issues in GitHub, and\nso on, are very much appreciated.\n\nI tried to cc everyone who appears in this edition, but maybe I missed\nsome people, sorry about that.\n\nJakub, Markus, Gabriel and me plan to publish this edition on\nWednesday March 21st.\n\nThanks,\nChristian.\n"},{"id":"342116","messageId":"CA+P7+xoL6TRP0NZJR7gQrVeLoQwK_1D_iDmG18Y=_i=U4uttgg@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"48076","inReplyTo":"CAP8UFD35QP0jwQ22jfUaNgo92o3vG8bV5n=iYnmn1ichxndphg@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 37","fromName":"Jacob Keller","fromEmail":"jacob.keller@gmail.com","sentAt":"2018-03-18T22:41:05Z","receivedAt":"2018-03-18T22:41:32Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"jacob.keller@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/874719?v=4"},"body":"On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Christian Couder\n wrote:\n> Hi,\n>\n> A draft of a new Git Rev News edition is available here:\n>\n> https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-37.md\n>\n> Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section either by editing the\n> above page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on\n> this GitHub issue:\n>\n> https://github.com/git/git.github.io/issues/279\n>\n> You can also reply to this email.\n>\n> In general all kinds of contribution, for example proofreading,\n> suggestions for articles or links, help on the issues in GitHub, and\n> so on, are very much appreciated.\n>\n> I tried to cc everyone who appears in this edition, but maybe I missed\n> some people, sorry about that.\n>\n> Jakub, Markus, Gabriel and me plan to publish this edition on\n> Wednesday March 21st.\n>\n> Thanks,\n> Christian.\n\nI don't have a good summary yet, but I think a section about the\ndiscussion regarding the new recreate-merges and rebasing merges\nthat's been on going might be useful? a lot of that discussion\noccurred prior to git-merge (tho it's been ongoing since then?).\n\nThanks,\nJake\n"},{"id":"342123","messageId":"CAP8UFD0wWiivjzJ29-RPVyOxkmbFACXTwHLyPrMdsUsW__RsYQ@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"48076","inReplyTo":"CA+P7+xoL6TRP0NZJR7gQrVeLoQwK_1D_iDmG18Y=_i=U4uttgg@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 37","fromName":"Christian Couder","fromEmail":"christian.couder@gmail.com","sentAt":"2018-03-19T00:34:07Z","receivedAt":"2018-03-19T00:34:14Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"christian.couder@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/208954?v=4"},"body":"On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:\n>\n> I don't have a good summary yet, but I think a section about the\n> discussion regarding the new recreate-merges and rebasing merges\n> that's been on going might be useful?\n\nYeah sure, we would gladly accept a summary of this discussion.\n\n> a lot of that discussion\n> occurred prior to git-merge (tho it's been ongoing since then?).\n\nIf you want to take the latest discussions into account, the summary\ncould be either split into two parts, one for this edition and the\nother one for the next edition. Or we could wait and have the whole\nsummary in the next edition.\n\nThanks,\nChristian.\n"},{"id":"343393","messageId":"nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1803301059450.5026@qfpub.tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet","threadId":"48076","inReplyTo":"CAP8UFD0wWiivjzJ29-RPVyOxkmbFACXTwHLyPrMdsUsW__RsYQ@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 37","fromName":"Johannes Schindelin","fromEmail":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","sentAt":"2018-03-30T09:02:06Z","receivedAt":"2018-03-30T09:02:38Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/127790?v=4"},"body":"Hi,\n\nOn Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Christian Couder wrote:\n\n> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:\n> >\n> > I don't have a good summary yet, but I think a section about the\n> > discussion regarding the new recreate-merges and rebasing merges\n> > that's been on going might be useful?\n> \n> Yeah sure, we would gladly accept a summary of this discussion.\n\nI would *love* a summary of that discussion, especially since it got\npretty unwieldy (and partially out of hand, but that part probably does\nnot need a lot of detail apart from the adjective \"heated\").\n\n> > a lot of that discussion occurred prior to git-merge (tho it's been\n> > ongoing since then?).\n> \n> If you want to take the latest discussions into account, the summary\n> could be either split into two parts, one for this edition and the\n> other one for the next edition. Or we could wait and have the whole\n> summary in the next edition.\n\nJake, I do not know about your availability, but I would love it if you\ncould take a stab, as I trust you to be unbiased. I would not trust myself\nto be unbiased because (as everybody saw who cared to read) I got a little\nbit too emotional and should have stayed more professional.\n\nThanks,\nDscho\n"},{"id":"343433","messageId":"CA+P7+xoEquzyFFtpsmHb4WDLJiaDb1r5fDTsHk=4qyj4sVXm0w@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"48076","inReplyTo":"nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1803301059450.5026@qfpub.tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet","subject":"Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 37","fromName":"Jacob Keller","fromEmail":"jacob.keller@gmail.com","sentAt":"2018-03-30T16:07:52Z","receivedAt":"2018-03-30T16:08:18Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"jacob.keller@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/874719?v=4"},"body":"On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 2:02 AM, Johannes Schindelin\n wrote:\n> Hi,\n>\n> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Christian Couder wrote:\n>\n>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:\n>> >\n>> > I don't have a good summary yet, but I think a section about the\n>> > discussion regarding the new recreate-merges and rebasing merges\n>> > that's been on going might be useful?\n>>\n>> Yeah sure, we would gladly accept a summary of this discussion.\n>\n> I would *love* a summary of that discussion, especially since it got\n> pretty unwieldy (and partially out of hand, but that part probably does\n> not need a lot of detail apart from the adjective \"heated\").\n>\n>> > a lot of that discussion occurred prior to git-merge (tho it's been\n>> > ongoing since then?).\n>>\n>> If you want to take the latest discussions into account, the summary\n>> could be either split into two parts, one for this edition and the\n>> other one for the next edition. Or we could wait and have the whole\n>> summary in the next edition.\n>\n> Jake, I do not know about your availability, but I would love it if you\n> could take a stab, as I trust you to be unbiased. I would not trust myself\n> to be unbiased because (as everybody saw who cared to read) I got a little\n> bit too emotional and should have stayed more professional.\n>\n> Thanks,\n> Dscho\n\nI hope to be able to make a summary of the discussion as best I can.\nIt may take a bit as there is a lot of mails to read. I agree that a\ngood summary should come from someone outside the discussion to reduce\nemotional bias.\n\nThanks,\nJake\n"},{"id":"343457","messageId":"nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1803302055440.5026@qfpub.tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet","threadId":"48076","inReplyTo":"CA+P7+xoEquzyFFtpsmHb4WDLJiaDb1r5fDTsHk=4qyj4sVXm0w@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 37","fromName":"Johannes Schindelin","fromEmail":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","sentAt":"2018-03-30T18:56:07Z","receivedAt":"2018-03-30T18:56:38Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/127790?v=4"},"body":"Hi Jake,\n\nOn Fri, 30 Mar 2018, Jacob Keller wrote:\n\n> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 2:02 AM, Johannes Schindelin\n> wrote:\n> >\n> > Jake, I do not know about your availability, but I would love it if\n> > you could take a stab, as I trust you to be unbiased. I would not\n> > trust myself to be unbiased because (as everybody saw who cared to\n> > read) I got a little bit too emotional and should have stayed more\n> > professional.\n> \n> I hope to be able to make a summary of the discussion as best I can.\n> It may take a bit as there is a lot of mails to read. I agree that a\n> good summary should come from someone outside the discussion to reduce\n> emotional bias.\n\nThank you so much!\nDscho\n"}]}