{"thread":{"id":"40502","subject":"Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] gc: remove broken symrefs","startedAt":"2015-10-06T13:59:48Z","lastAt":"2015-10-06T13:59:48Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Johannes Schindelin"],"isPatch":true,"patchVersion":2,"patchTotal":4},"messages":[{"id":"271228","messageId":"0fff9005109d99176ae99b7bfde6c576@dscho.org","threadId":"40502","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] gc: remove broken symrefs","fromName":"Johannes Schindelin","fromEmail":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","sentAt":"2015-10-06T13:59:48Z","receivedAt":"2015-10-06T13:59:48Z","isPatch":true,"sender":{"key":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/127790?v=4"},"body":"Hi Junio,\n\nOn 2015-10-06 00:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:\n> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> writes:\n> \n>> Oh, I appreciate your feedback. I am actually not all *that* certain\n>> that removing the broken symref is the correct thing. It is this sort\n>> of fruitful exchange that allows me to throw out an idea and be\n>> relatively certain that something better will come out of v3 or v8 of\n>> the patch series than what I had in mind.\n>>\n>> To be honest, the most important outcome is probably 2/4 -- which\n>> should be enough to fix the issue reported by the Git for Windows\n>> user. I could adjust the test so that it no longer insists that\n>> origin/HEAD` be deleted, but still requires that `git gc` succeeds.\n>>\n>> I would have no problem to let this sit for a couple of days until\n>> the final verdict.\n> \n> ... and a few days have passed.  I am tempted to do the easy bits\n> first, discarding the parts that both of us feel iffy for now\n> without prejudice, keeping the first two commits with a bit of\n> tweak.\n\nI agree. And I just sent out v3 of the patch series.\n\nThanks,\nDscho\n"}]}