{"thread":{"id":"39992","subject":"Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] bisect per-worktree","startedAt":"2015-08-01T05:43:17Z","lastAt":"2015-08-01T05:43:17Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["David Turner"],"isPatch":true,"patchVersion":1,"patchTotal":2},"messages":[{"id":"267255","messageId":"1438407797.4735.30.camel@twopensource.com","threadId":"39992","inReplyTo":"CAP8UFD0aCSW3JxneHvSEE3T6zQtgipp5nhWT9VpMqHAmzd_e3Q@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] bisect per-worktree","fromName":"David Turner","fromEmail":"dturner@twopensource.com","sentAt":"2015-08-01T05:43:17Z","receivedAt":"2015-08-01T05:43:17Z","isPatch":true,"sender":{"key":"novalis@novalis.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/77003?v=4"},"body":"On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 06:04 +0200, Christian Couder wrote:\n> \n> Le 1 août 2015 09:01, \"David Turner\" <dturner@twopensource.com> a\n> écrit :\n> >\n> > This is RFC because I'm not sure why show-ref only works on refs/\n> (and\n> > whether it should learn to look in worktree-refs/).  I'm also not\n> sure\n> > whether there are other changes I should make to refs.c to handle\n> > per-worktree refs; I basically did the simplest thing I could think\n> of\n> > to start with.\n> \n> (Sorry, I am answering from my phone, as I am having a vacation. )\n\nEnjoy your vacation.\n\n> I wonder what would happen if people upgrade in the middle of a\n> bisection or if they have scripts using \"bisect/bad\" for example.\n\nJunio told me not to worry about this, so I didn't.  \n"}]}