{"thread":{"id":"33514","subject":"No \"What's cooking\" yet, but...","startedAt":"2013-04-15T07:26:58Z","lastAt":"2013-04-15T07:26:58Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Junio C Hamano"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"214269","messageId":"7vvc7o1cfx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org","threadId":"33514","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"No \"What's cooking\" yet, but...","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2013-04-15T07:26:58Z","receivedAt":"2013-04-15T07:26:58Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"I've merged a handful more topics to 'next'.\n\nIt is likely that I'll be merging kb/status-ignored-optim to\n'master' soonish, but as I kept saying this topic touches rather\ncore part of working tree inspection code, so a fallout from it may\naffect not just \"status -u<various>\" but more destructive \"add\",\n\"rm\". A final eyeballing of the topic is very much appreciated.\n\nAlso I've ejected nd/magic-pathspecs and as/check-ignore topics from\n'pu' for now, as the former when taken with jl/submodule-mv were\nsomehow breaking the tests (I was running the integration run for\n'pu' without 5301, 5700, 7001 and 7408 for a few days), and the\nlatter topic did not play well with kb/status-ignored-optim topic.\nWe may want to revisit them after having a few more topics graduate\nto 'master' first and then ask them to be rebased.\n\nThanks.\n"}]}