{"thread":{"id":"32693","subject":"Aw: Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] Change old system name 'GIT' to 'Git'","startedAt":"2013-01-22T18:27:05Z","lastAt":"2013-01-22T18:27:05Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Thomas Ackermann"],"isPatch":true,"patchVersion":3,"patchTotal":6},"messages":[{"id":"207517","messageId":"166890920.792266.1358879225366.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail06.arcor-online.net","threadId":"32693","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Aw: Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] Change old system name 'GIT' to 'Git'","fromName":"Thomas Ackermann","fromEmail":"th.acker@arcor.de","sentAt":"2013-01-22T18:27:05Z","receivedAt":"2013-01-22T18:27:05Z","isPatch":true,"sender":{"key":"th.acker@arcor.de","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1358536?v=4"},"body":" \n> \n> I left this as-is in my \"fixup\" commit, as the html and manpage\n> backends seem to typeset the section titles differently.  I however\n> have to wonder what the result will look like if we replaced it with\n> \n> \tTypical use of Git credential\n> \n> Can you try and see how well it works?\n> \nThe html and manpage backends both don't change the 'poor-man's bold face'\nof the section titles and all the rest of the documentation uses this same style.\nSo we should leave this as is.\n\n> \n> I'd really hate to see these patches posted again to the list and\n> asking for re-reviewing the whole thing.  Can we go incremental\n> while parking these original patches on 'pu', and later squash the\n> whole thing into two commits, or something?\n> \nOf course.\n\n\n---\nThomas\n"}]}