{"thread":{"id":"31938","subject":"Who is the 'git' vendor?","startedAt":"2012-10-25T06:43:46Z","lastAt":"2012-10-25T23:10:48Z","messageCount":4,"participants":["PROHASKA, Thor","Andreas Ericsson","Jeff King"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"201855","messageId":"8F7A9DADB4F4064EB938B0D3EBB63FDC208A5A34@PBNEMBMSX4120.int.Corp.sun","threadId":"31938","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Who is the 'git' vendor?","fromName":"PROHASKA, Thor","fromEmail":"thor.prohaska@suncorp.com.au","sentAt":"2012-10-25T06:43:46Z","receivedAt":"2012-10-25T06:43:46Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"thor.prohaska@suncorp.com.au","avatar":null},"body":"Hi,\n\nThe organisation I am currently working for uses 'git'.\n\nIn order to manage all the software used in the organisation we have been compiling a list of software that includes the software Vendor's name.\n\nMy colleague has listed the vendor of git as being the 'Software Freedom Conservancy'. Can you please advise me if this is correct? If not, who should the vendor be identified as?\n\nRegards,\n\nThor\n\n\nThor Prohaska\nTest Coordinator - Desktop Anywhere\nEnterprise Engineering BT,\n3/300 Queen St, Brisbane\nDesk Phone: 07 3362 1809\nMobile: 0419 344 806\n\n\n\n________________________________\n\nThis e-mail is sent by Suncorp Group Limited ABN 66 145 290 124 or one of its related entities \"Suncorp\".\nSuncorp may be contacted at Level 18, 36 Wickham Terrace, Brisbane or on 13 11 55 or at suncorp.com.au.\nThe content of this e-mail is the view of the sender or stated author and does not necessarily reflect the view of Suncorp. The content, including attachments, is a confidential communication between Suncorp and the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this e-mail, including attachments, is unauthorised and expressly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and any attachments from your system.\n"},{"id":"201869","messageId":"5088FDDC.20404@op5.se","threadId":"31938","inReplyTo":"8F7A9DADB4F4064EB938B0D3EBB63FDC208A5A34@PBNEMBMSX4120.int.Corp.sun","subject":"Re: Who is the 'git' vendor?","fromName":"Andreas Ericsson","fromEmail":"ae@op5.se","sentAt":"2012-10-25T08:52:44Z","receivedAt":"2012-10-25T08:52:44Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"ae@op5.se","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/426e89595c75a8f5252dd0c989e5fabe5bcac616e68557427ad9aef6b0ca342a?d=mp&s=160"},"body":"On 10/25/2012 08:43 AM, PROHASKA, Thor wrote:\n> Hi,\n> \n> The organisation I am currently working for uses 'git'.\n> \n> In order to manage all the software used in the organisation we have\n> been compiling a list of software that includes the software Vendor's\n> name.\n> \n> My colleague has listed the vendor of git as being the 'Software\n> Freedom Conservancy'. Can you please advise me if this is correct? If\n> not, who should the vendor be identified as?\n> \n\nMost likely, you'll want to put \"git@vger.kernel.org\" as vendor for git,\nas the whole vendor concept doesn't really fly with FOSS. There's noone\nto go to if it breaks your systems, and unless you purchase a support\ncontract from somewhere there's noone to turn to except the (excellent)\ngit community in case you have issues with it.\n\n-- \nAndreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se\nOP5 AB                             www.op5.se\nTel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231\n\nConsidering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and\nterror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war\non peace.\n"},{"id":"201872","messageId":"20121025091017.GE8390@sigill.intra.peff.net","threadId":"31938","inReplyTo":"5088FDDC.20404@op5.se","subject":"Re: Who is the 'git' vendor?","fromName":"Jeff King","fromEmail":"peff@peff.net","sentAt":"2012-10-25T09:10:17Z","receivedAt":"2012-10-25T09:10:17Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"peff@peff.net","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/45925?v=4"},"body":"On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:52:44AM +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote:\n\n> On 10/25/2012 08:43 AM, PROHASKA, Thor wrote:\n> > Hi,\n> > \n> > The organisation I am currently working for uses 'git'.\n> > \n> > In order to manage all the software used in the organisation we have\n> > been compiling a list of software that includes the software Vendor's\n> > name.\n> > \n> > My colleague has listed the vendor of git as being the 'Software\n> > Freedom Conservancy'. Can you please advise me if this is correct? If\n> > not, who should the vendor be identified as?\n> > \n> \n> Most likely, you'll want to put \"git@vger.kernel.org\" as vendor for git,\n> as the whole vendor concept doesn't really fly with FOSS. There's noone\n> to go to if it breaks your systems, and unless you purchase a support\n> contract from somewhere there's noone to turn to except the (excellent)\n> git community in case you have issues with it.\n\nYeah. Depending on the purpose of the list, I would probably _not_ put\nthe SFC. They help manage the legal and financial aspects of the git\nproject, but they have nothing at all to do with the code itself. I\nwould hate for them to get a phone call about support. :)\n\nProbably \"The Git Community\" or \"git@vger.kernel.org\" is the best thing\nto fill in if you need to write something in a form. If there ends up\nbeing some specific reason for a vendor to be contacted, folks on the\nlist will be able to point an inquiry in the right direction (which\nmight even end up being the SFC).\n\n-Peff\n"},{"id":"201927","messageId":"8F7A9DADB4F4064EB938B0D3EBB63FDC208A6024@PBNEMBMSX4120.int.Corp.sun","threadId":"31938","inReplyTo":"20121025091017.GE8390@sigill.intra.peff.net","subject":"RE: Who is the 'git' vendor?","fromName":"PROHASKA, Thor","fromEmail":"thor.prohaska@suncorp.com.au","sentAt":"2012-10-25T23:10:48Z","receivedAt":"2012-10-25T23:10:48Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"thor.prohaska@suncorp.com.au","avatar":null},"body":"Thanks Andreas & Jeff. Your advice is much appreciated. Cheers, Thor\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: Jeff King [mailto:peff@peff.net]\nSent: Thursday, 25 October 2012 7:10 PM\nTo: PROHASKA, Thor\nCc: Andreas Ericsson; 'git@vger.kernel.org'; 'Thor Home (thorlp@hotkey.net.au)'\nSubject: Re: Who is the 'git' vendor?\n\nOn Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:52:44AM +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote:\n\n> On 10/25/2012 08:43 AM, PROHASKA, Thor wrote:\n> > Hi,\n> >\n> > The organisation I am currently working for uses 'git'.\n> >\n> > In order to manage all the software used in the organisation we have\n> > been compiling a list of software that includes the software\n> > Vendor's name.\n> >\n> > My colleague has listed the vendor of git as being the 'Software\n> > Freedom Conservancy'. Can you please advise me if this is correct?\n> > If not, who should the vendor be identified as?\n> >\n>\n> Most likely, you'll want to put \"git@vger.kernel.org\" as vendor for\n> git, as the whole vendor concept doesn't really fly with FOSS. There's\n> noone to go to if it breaks your systems, and unless you purchase a\n> support contract from somewhere there's noone to turn to except the\n> (excellent) git community in case you have issues with it.\n\nYeah. Depending on the purpose of the list, I would probably _not_ put the SFC. They help manage the legal and financial aspects of the git project, but they have nothing at all to do with the code itself. I would hate for them to get a phone call about support. :)\n\nProbably \"The Git Community\" or \"git@vger.kernel.org\" is the best thing to fill in if you need to write something in a form. If there ends up being some specific reason for a vendor to be contacted, folks on the list will be able to point an inquiry in the right direction (which might even end up being the SFC).\n\n-Peff\n\n________________________________\n\nThis e-mail is sent by Suncorp Group Limited ABN 66 145 290 124 or one of its related entities \"Suncorp\".\nSuncorp may be contacted at Level 18, 36 Wickham Terrace, Brisbane or on 13 11 55 or at suncorp.com.au.\nThe content of this e-mail is the view of the sender or stated author and does not necessarily reflect the view of Suncorp. The content, including attachments, is a confidential communication between Suncorp and the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this e-mail, including attachments, is unauthorised and expressly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and any attachments from your system.\n"}]}