{"thread":{"id":"2960","subject":"RE: [OT] Shameless troll ;o)","startedAt":"2006-01-04T01:49:46Z","lastAt":"2006-01-04T04:56:31Z","messageCount":2,"participants":["Brown, Len","Linus Torvalds"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"14156","messageId":"F7DC2337C7631D4386A2DF6E8FB22B300596583E@hdsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com","threadId":"2960","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"RE: [OT] Shameless troll ;o)","fromName":"Brown, Len","fromEmail":"len.brown@intel.com","sentAt":"2006-01-04T01:49:46Z","receivedAt":"2006-01-04T01:49:46Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"len.brown@intel.com","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/a091f34f66caadb51d85a8a496800c6ccae73737e2f45762373e6b8c55fa5dd6?d=mp&s=160"},"body":" \n>Yes, Forbes is...\n>... a small step up from the check-out counter magazines \n>that alternately glorify and vilify Jessica Simpson or whoever is the \n>celebrity of the week.\n\nWhile not the WSJ (which I actually read) or the Economist (which I haven't\nhad time to read since parenthood), I think that Business Week is also\na step up -- as evidenced by its classy cover!:-)\n\nhttp://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_05/b3918002_mz001.htm\n"},{"id":"14161","messageId":"Pine.LNX.4.64.0601032055570.3668@g5.osdl.org","threadId":"2960","inReplyTo":"F7DC2337C7631D4386A2DF6E8FB22B300596583E@hdsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com","subject":"RE: [OT] Shameless troll ;o)","fromName":"Linus Torvalds","fromEmail":"torvalds@osdl.org","sentAt":"2006-01-04T04:56:31Z","receivedAt":"2006-01-04T04:56:31Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"torvalds@linux-foundation.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1024025?v=4"},"body":"\n\nOn Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Brown, Len wrote:\n> \n> While not the WSJ (which I actually read) or the Economist (which I haven't\n> had time to read since parenthood), I think that Business Week is also\n> a step up -- as evidenced by its classy cover!:-)\n\nI prefer the Jessica Simpson covers personally, but hey, I can't fault \nyour taste.\n\n\t\tLinus\n"}]}