{"thread":{"id":"29177","subject":"git 1.7.7.5","startedAt":"2011-12-16T10:57:58Z","lastAt":"2011-12-21T19:10:09Z","messageCount":6,"participants":["Jonathan Nieder","Thomas Jarosch","Junio C Hamano"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"181286","messageId":"20111216105757.GA11174@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net","threadId":"29177","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"git 1.7.7.5","fromName":"Jonathan Nieder","fromEmail":"jrnieder@gmail.com","sentAt":"2011-12-16T10:57:58Z","receivedAt":"2011-12-16T10:57:58Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"jrnieder@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/281595?v=4"},"body":"Hi Junio,\n\nI noticed that v1.7.7.5 was tagged a few days ago (b36dcd72), but\nthere is no corresponding tarball at\n\n http://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list\n\nWill there be an official tarball?\n\nI don't mind either way, but it would be useful to know whether\ndistributors should make their own or just wait.\n\nThanks,\nJonathan\n"},{"id":"181459","messageId":"201112191041.07629.thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com","threadId":"29177","inReplyTo":"20111216105757.GA11174@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net","subject":"Re: git 1.7.7.5","fromName":"Thomas Jarosch","fromEmail":"thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com","sentAt":"2011-12-19T09:41:07Z","receivedAt":"2011-12-19T09:41:07Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1146758?v=4"},"body":"On Friday, 16. December 2011 11:57:58 Jonathan Nieder wrote:\n> I noticed that v1.7.7.5 was tagged a few days ago (b36dcd72), but\n> there is no corresponding tarball at\n> \n>  http://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list\n> \n> Will there be an official tarball?\n> \n> I don't mind either way, but it would be useful to know whether\n> distributors should make their own or just wait.\n\nLooks like a bug, the front page of \"git-scm.com\" also shows 1.7.7.5\nas latest stable release and leads to a dead link.\n\nCheers,\nThomas\n"},{"id":"181485","messageId":"7vbor4mhv7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org","threadId":"29177","inReplyTo":"201112191041.07629.thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com","subject":"Re: git 1.7.7.5","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2011-12-19T20:22:36Z","receivedAt":"2011-12-19T20:22:36Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com> writes:\n\n> On Friday, 16. December 2011 11:57:58 Jonathan Nieder wrote:\n>> I noticed that v1.7.7.5 was tagged a few days ago (b36dcd72), but\n>> there is no corresponding tarball at\n>> \n>>  http://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list\n>> \n>> Will there be an official tarball?\n>> \n>> I don't mind either way, but it would be useful to know whether\n>> distributors should make their own or just wait.\n>\n> Looks like a bug, the front page of \"git-scm.com\" also shows 1.7.7.5\n> as latest stable release and leads to a dead link.\n\nThere actually is no bug; I just haven't got around to generating signed\ntarballs yet.\n\nI tend to agree that after 1.7.8 was released, showing 1.7.7.5 as the\nlatest stable indeed a bug (1.7.8 is still the latest stable and the next\nlatest stable will be 1.7.8.1), but that site is not under my direct\ncontrol, so...\n"},{"id":"181500","messageId":"7viplckt2m.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org","threadId":"29177","inReplyTo":"20111216105757.GA11174@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net","subject":"Re: git 1.7.7.5","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2011-12-20T00:03:29Z","receivedAt":"2011-12-20T00:03:29Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:\n\n> I noticed that v1.7.7.5 was tagged a few days ago (b36dcd72), but\n> there is no corresponding tarball at\n>\n>  http://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list\n>\n> Will there be an official tarball?\n>\n> I don't mind either way, but it would be useful to know whether\n> distributors should make their own or just wait.\n\nI personally would prefer distros to get stuff from the tagged release\npoint directly from SCM themselves, instead of using tarballs, but anyway\nI've uploaded both 1.7.7.5 and 1.7.6.5 tarballs.\n\nThanks.\n"},{"id":"181584","messageId":"201112211820.45447.thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com","threadId":"29177","inReplyTo":"7viplckt2m.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org","subject":"Re: git 1.7.7.5","fromName":"Thomas Jarosch","fromEmail":"thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com","sentAt":"2011-12-21T17:20:45Z","receivedAt":"2011-12-21T17:20:45Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1146758?v=4"},"body":"On Tuesday, 20. December 2011 01:03:29 Junio C Hamano wrote:\n> but anyway I've uploaded both 1.7.7.5 and 1.7.6.5 tarballs.\n\nThanks!\n\nMay be Scott Chacon can provide you commit access to git-scm.com ;)\nIf you are interested in this of course.\n\nFor example wikipedia lists git-scm.com as website for git.\n(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_%28software%29)\n\nCheers,\nThomas\n"},{"id":"181592","messageId":"7vehvxhhbi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org","threadId":"29177","inReplyTo":"201112211820.45447.thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com","subject":"Re: git 1.7.7.5","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2011-12-21T19:10:09Z","receivedAt":"2011-12-21T19:10:09Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com> writes:\n\n> May be Scott Chacon can provide you commit access to git-scm.com ;)\n> If you are interested in this of course.\n>\n> For example wikipedia lists git-scm.com as website for git.\n> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_%28software%29)\n\nNo, thanks.\n\nThey volunteered to keep the site up to date and useful to the user\ncommunity and they have been doing a good job at it, and that is why we\nadvertise git-scm.com as the official site. A minor bug like this which I\nknow they are perfectly capable of fixing at their site is not a\njustifiable incident to trigger taking control and credit over from them.\n"}]}