{"thread":{"id":"28912","subject":"feature request: git annotate -w like git blame -w","startedAt":"2011-11-11T13:02:44Z","lastAt":"2011-11-14T20:49:13Z","messageCount":4,"participants":["Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]","Jakub Narebski","Junio C Hamano"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"179313","messageId":"4EBD1CF4.7040002@ipax.at","threadId":"28912","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"feature request: git annotate -w like git blame -w","fromName":"Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]","fromEmail":"r.bhatia@ipax.at","sentAt":"2011-11-11T13:02:44Z","receivedAt":"2011-11-11T13:02:44Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"r.bhatia@ipax.at","avatar":null},"body":"hi!\n\nis it possible to add a \"git annotate -w\" option like git blame has?\n\nthanks,\nraoul\nps. please reply to me in cc as i'm not subscribed to this list.\n-- \n____________________________________________________________________\nDI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc.          email.          r.bhatia@ipax.at\nTechnischer Leiter\n\nIPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OG          web.          http://www.ipax.at\nBarawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11           email.            office@ipax.at\n1190 Wien                           tel.               +43 1 3670030\nFN 277995t HG Wien                  fax.            +43 1 3670030 15\n____________________________________________________________________\n"},{"id":"179315","messageId":"m3sjlun4o9.fsf@localhost.localdomain","threadId":"28912","inReplyTo":"4EBD1CF4.7040002@ipax.at","subject":"Re: feature request: git annotate -w like git blame -w","fromName":"Jakub Narebski","fromEmail":"jnareb@gmail.com","sentAt":"2011-11-11T13:57:03Z","receivedAt":"2011-11-11T13:57:03Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"jnareb@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2706?v=4"},"body":"\"Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]\" <r.bhatia@ipax.at> writes:\n\n> is it possible to add a \"git annotate -w\" option like git blame has?\n\nWhy not use \"git blame -c -w\"?  `-c' turns on annotate-compatibile\noutput.\n\nFrom git-annotate(1) manpage:\n\n   The only difference between this command and git-blame(1) is that they  use\n   slightly  different  output formats, and this command exists only for back-\n   ward compatibility to support existing scripts, and provide a more familiar\n   command name for people coming from other SCM systems.\n \n> ps. please reply to me in cc as i'm not subscribed to this list.\n\nThis is usual behavior on this list.\n\n-- \nJakub Narębski\n"},{"id":"179433","messageId":"4EC13FEE.2040401@ipax.at","threadId":"28912","inReplyTo":"m3sjlun4o9.fsf@localhost.localdomain","subject":"Re: feature request: git annotate -w like git blame -w","fromName":"Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]","fromEmail":"r.bhatia@ipax.at","sentAt":"2011-11-14T16:21:02Z","receivedAt":"2011-11-14T16:21:02Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"r.bhatia@ipax.at","avatar":null},"body":"On 2011-11-11 14:57, Jakub Narebski wrote:\n> \"Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]\"<r.bhatia@ipax.at>  writes:\n>\n>> is it possible to add a \"git annotate -w\" option like git blame has?\n>\n> Why not use \"git blame -c -w\"?  `-c' turns on annotate-compatibile\n> output.\n>\n>  From git-annotate(1) manpage:\n>\n>     The only difference between this command and git-blame(1) is that they  use\n>     slightly  different  output formats, and this command exists only for back-\n>     ward compatibility to support existing scripts, and provide a more familiar\n>     command name for people coming from other SCM systems.\n\nthanks for this clarification. somehow, i missed this part while\nscanning the man pages.\n\nthank you and sorry for the noise!\nraoul\n-- \n____________________________________________________________________\nDI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc.          email.          r.bhatia@ipax.at\nTechnischer Leiter\n\nIPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OG          web.          http://www.ipax.at\nBarawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11           email.            office@ipax.at\n1190 Wien                           tel.               +43 1 3670030\nFN 277995t HG Wien                  fax.            +43 1 3670030 15\n____________________________________________________________________\n"},{"id":"179445","messageId":"7vvcqmig52.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org","threadId":"28912","inReplyTo":"m3sjlun4o9.fsf@localhost.localdomain","subject":"Re: feature request: git annotate -w like git blame -w","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2011-11-14T20:49:13Z","receivedAt":"2011-11-14T20:49:13Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:\n\n> \"Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]\" <r.bhatia@ipax.at> writes:\n>\n>> is it possible to add a \"git annotate -w\" option like git blame has?\n>\n> Why not use \"git blame -c -w\"?  `-c' turns on annotate-compatibile\n> output.\n>\n> From git-annotate(1) manpage:\n>\n>    The only difference between this command and git-blame(1) is that they  use\n>    slightly  different  output formats, and this command exists only for back-\n>    ward compatibility to support existing scripts, and provide a more familiar\n>    command name for people coming from other SCM systems.\n\nSomebody may want to compare git-blame.txt and git-annotate.txt in\nDocumentation/, notice that they share blame-options.txt and that the\nformer has accumulated option descriptions for a few more options that\nshould have been placed in blame-options.txt, and then prepare a patch to\nimprove the documentation?  Hint, hint...\n\nI *think* '-c', '-f', and '-n' are blame-only options but all others would\nwork with annotate (whoever is doing the patch needs to verify this,\nthough).\n"}]}