{"thread":{"id":"28400","subject":"Re: vcs-svn and firends","startedAt":"2011-09-15T17:45:39Z","lastAt":"2011-09-15T17:45:39Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Jonathan Nieder"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"175592","messageId":"20110915174539.GB19450@elie","threadId":"28400","inReplyTo":"CA+gfSn9TU1mfAifL=1CDdq_cz7M7BgNLDuPAtzbMSf04WB-K3w@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: vcs-svn and firends","fromName":"Jonathan Nieder","fromEmail":"jrnieder@gmail.com","sentAt":"2011-09-15T17:45:39Z","receivedAt":"2011-09-15T17:45:39Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"jrnieder@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/281595?v=4"},"body":"Dmitry Ivankov wrote:\n\n> A very quick view suggests that they could be reorganized, if it's okay.\n> For example:\n> - squash optifying REPORT_FILENO with it's addition.\n> - drop changes to repo_tree.c that were later erased\n> ...I bet there are more\n>\n> Does it make sense or we should better not rewrite the history?\n\nAll else being equal, it is better not to rewrite history, especially\nwhen there are multiple series building on a commit (as is the case\nfor most commits in the\n\n git://repo.or.cz/git/jrn.git svn-fe\n\nbranch, just like Junio's \"master\" branch).\n\nCheers,\nJonathan\n"}]}