{"thread":{"id":"24614","subject":"[PATCH v2 0/3] git stash branch fixes","startedAt":"2010-08-03T10:42:48Z","lastAt":"2010-08-04T22:44:41Z","messageCount":2,"participants":["Jon Seymour"],"isPatch":true,"patchVersion":2,"patchTotal":3},"messages":[{"id":"147037","messageId":"AANLkTi=6k7HcUYWhSi8XDfF0GnAwFdfN6b-ebf87eGSC@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"24614","inReplyTo":"AANLkTik8Npy99jKqUan8wOTXNffBCGwS_WnPwbhXqJYK@mail.gmail.com","subject":"[PATCH v2 0/3] git stash branch fixes","fromName":"Jon Seymour","fromEmail":"jon.seymour@gmail.com","sentAt":"2010-08-03T10:42:48Z","receivedAt":"2010-08-03T10:42:48Z","isPatch":true,"sender":{"key":"jon.seymour@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/207131?v=4"},"body":"| fixed the subject line - sorry !\n\nThis series fixes git stash branch so that it is more tolerant of\nstash-like commits created with git stash create.\n\nIt particular, it doesn't require there to be a stash stack if a\nstash-like argument is specified and it doesn't attempt to drop\nnon-stash references after applying the stash.\n\nThis series replaces my previous patch that just included a test\nthat demonstrated the existance of the issue.\n\n stash: It looks like a stash, but doesn't quack like a stash...\n stash: Allow git stash branch to process commits that look like\n   stashes but are not stash references.\n stash: modify tests to reflect stash branch fixes.\n\n git-stash.sh     |   10 ++++++++--\n t/t3903-stash.sh |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++\n 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n\n--\n1.7.2.1.111.g8fc90\n"},{"id":"147140","messageId":"AANLkTi=WDnfT_RQDABpN5Y_EoVWK_SRMa2WSHu8p35Pp@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"24614","inReplyTo":"AANLkTik8Npy99jKqUan8wOTXNffBCGwS_WnPwbhXqJYK@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] git stash branch fixes","fromName":"Jon Seymour","fromEmail":"jon.seymour@gmail.com","sentAt":"2010-08-04T22:44:41Z","receivedAt":"2010-08-04T22:44:41Z","isPatch":true,"sender":{"key":"jon.seymour@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/207131?v=4"},"body":"Hi, does anyone see any reason why this series could not be a\ncandidate for merging into next or master? If there is some reason for\nme to re-post it, let me know.\n\nRegards,\n\njon.\n\nOn Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> wrote:\n> | fixed the subject line - sorry !\n>\n> This series fixes git stash branch so that it is more tolerant of\n> stash-like commits created with git stash create.\n>\n> It particular, it doesn't require there to be a stash stack if a\n> stash-like argument is specified and it doesn't attempt to drop\n> non-stash references after applying the stash.\n>\n> This series replaces my previous patch that just included a test\n> that demonstrated the existance of the issue.\n>\n>  stash: It looks like a stash, but doesn't quack like a stash...\n>  stash: Allow git stash branch to process commits that look like\n>    stashes but are not stash references.\n>  stash: modify tests to reflect stash branch fixes.\n>\n>  git-stash.sh     |   10 ++++++++--\n>  t/t3903-stash.sh |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++\n>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n>\n> --\n> 1.7.2.1.111.g8fc90\n>\n>\n>\n"}]}