{"thread":{"id":"2432","subject":"Re: [PATCH] Add --pretty=fuller","startedAt":"2005-11-10T14:42:57Z","lastAt":"2005-11-10T14:42:57Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Jon Loeliger"],"isPatch":true,"patchVersion":1,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"11477","messageId":"E1EaDdh-0007qo-E2@jdl.com","threadId":"2432","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Re: [PATCH] Add --pretty=fuller","fromName":"Jon Loeliger","fromEmail":"jdl@freescale.com","sentAt":"2005-11-10T14:42:57Z","receivedAt":"2005-11-10T14:42:57Z","isPatch":true,"sender":{"key":"jdl@jdl.com","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/75ce9a10b151acd2c28ec4ab2136dba7b2ff1634530bd04b155981a749d08a64?d=mp&s=160"},"body":"\nAndreas wrote:\n\n> --show-author=date,timestamp,name\n> --show-committer=name,time\n> --show=name,date (for both author and committer)\n> \n> or some such, with --pretty=<something> just a short-hand for those \n> show-options?\n\nWhich just looks like a candidate for the [log]\nsection of the config file to me.  Or is the \"git log\"\noutput needing to be standardized enough that this\nlevel of flexability is a bad idea?  Dunno.\n\njdl\n"}]}