{"thread":{"id":"2397","subject":"make tests ignorable with \"make -i\"","startedAt":"2005-11-08T09:51:10Z","lastAt":"2005-11-09T08:15:56Z","messageCount":4,"participants":["Alex Riesen","Junio C Hamano"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"11311","messageId":"81b0412b0511080151v69bc4578we093eaa751ee4bac@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"2397","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"make tests ignorable with \"make -i\"","fromName":"Alex Riesen","fromEmail":"raa.lkml@gmail.com","sentAt":"2005-11-08T09:51:10Z","receivedAt":"2005-11-08T09:51:10Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"raa.lkml@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/324101?v=4"},"body":"Allow failed tests to be ignored using make's \"-i\". The patch also\ndisables parallel make in t/. This doesn't make the testing any\ndifferent as before: the tests were run sequentially before.\n\nIt also allows to run more tests, ignoring the ones usually failing\njust to figure out if something else broke.  (Or to ignore plainly\nuninteresting situations because of the testing being done on say...\ncygwin ;)\n\n---\n\nHow about hiding \"ok ...\" output?\n"},{"id":"11341","messageId":"7vmzkfey4o.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net","threadId":"2397","inReplyTo":"81b0412b0511080151v69bc4578we093eaa751ee4bac@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: make tests ignorable with \"make -i\"","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"junkio@cox.net","sentAt":"2005-11-08T19:29:59Z","receivedAt":"2005-11-08T19:29:59Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes:\n\n> ...  (Or to ignore plainly\n> uninteresting situations because of the testing being done on say...\n> cygwin ;)\n\nCould you tell us which ones break on Cygwin?\n"},{"id":"11348","messageId":"20051108211618.GA3224@steel.home","threadId":"2397","inReplyTo":"7vmzkfey4o.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net","subject":"Re: make tests ignorable with \"make -i\"","fromName":"Alex Riesen","fromEmail":"raa.lkml@gmail.com","sentAt":"2005-11-08T21:16:18Z","receivedAt":"2005-11-08T21:16:18Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"raa.lkml@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/324101?v=4"},"body":"Junio C Hamano, Tue, Nov 08, 2005 20:29:59 +0100:\n> > ...  (Or to ignore plainly uninteresting situations because of the\n> > testing being done on say...  cygwin ;)\n> \n> Could you tell us which ones break on Cygwin?\n> \n\nof course. I remember t4000-diff-format having problems, using chmod +x\nand comparing the results afterwards (it's not really cygwin problem,\nbut FAT). I let the whole suite running tomorrow and just post the\nfailed here (instead of dreaming how nice would it be to live in a\nperfect world).\n"},{"id":"11380","messageId":"81b0412b0511090015w4ee0b26fg3e8fc7d192c53283@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"2397","inReplyTo":"20051108211618.GA3224@steel.home","subject":"Re: make tests ignorable with \"make -i\"","fromName":"Alex Riesen","fromEmail":"raa.lkml@gmail.com","sentAt":"2005-11-09T08:15:56Z","receivedAt":"2005-11-09T08:15:56Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"raa.lkml@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/324101?v=4"},"body":"On 11/8/05, Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> wrote:\n> Junio C Hamano, Tue, Nov 08, 2005 20:29:59 +0100:\n> > > ...  (Or to ignore plainly uninteresting situations because of the\n> > > testing being done on say...  cygwin ;)\n> >\n> > Could you tell us which ones break on Cygwin?\n> >\n\nSo far:\n\nt4000-diff-format.sh\n* FAIL 3: validate git-diff-files -p output.\n        compare_diff_patch current expected\n\nt4006-diff-mode.sh\n* FAIL 3: verify\n        diff -u expected check\n\nt4102-apply-rename.sh\n* FAIL 3: validate\n        test -f bar && ls -l bar | grep \"^-..x......\"\n"}]}