{"thread":{"id":"23864","subject":"Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool annotated tag, v2.2.7b, created. v2.2.7b","startedAt":"2010-05-21T05:52:12Z","lastAt":"2010-05-21T09:48:08Z","messageCount":2,"participants":["Gary V. Vaughan","Thomas Rast"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"142015","messageId":"A3F5E117-5E3D-4C9B-97A9-5C75D0ACF8E2@gnu.org","threadId":"23864","inReplyTo":"E1OFFfN-0003gH-6w@vcs-noshell.in.savannah.gnu.org","subject":"Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool annotated tag, v2.2.7b, created. v2.2.7b","fromName":"Gary V. Vaughan","fromEmail":"gary@gnu.org","sentAt":"2010-05-21T05:52:12Z","receivedAt":"2010-05-21T05:52:12Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gary@gnu.org","avatar":null},"body":"Git bug?  Or am I misunderstanding something?\n\nOn 21 May 2010, at 07:00, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:\n> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was\n> generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing\n> the project \"GNU Libtool\".\n> \n> The annotated tag, v2.2.7b has been created\n>        at  13412c2e2dfe7a720483c8d1dc98ca21c13c0483 (tag)\n>   tagging  99da5501fcca20d7cab7f328e223c7520c1a6701 (commit)\n>  replaces  v2.2.6\n   ^^^^^^^\n> tagged by  Gary V. Vaughan\n>        on  Fri May 21 06:26:53 2010 +0700\n\nThis implies v2.2.6 tag was removed, and v2.2.7b was created in its place.\nAnd yet in a freshly cloned tree I still see the v2.2.6 tag at commit\nc7f97f395615fb62c96de30c6925484ecd0cee2e.  I'm running git version 1.6.6.1.\n\nCheers,\nGary\n-- \nGary V. Vaughan <gary@gnu.org>\n"},{"id":"142018","messageId":"201005211148.08994.trast@student.ethz.ch","threadId":"23864","inReplyTo":"A3F5E117-5E3D-4C9B-97A9-5C75D0ACF8E2@gnu.org","subject":"Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool annotated tag, v2.2.7b, created. v2.2.7b","fromName":"Thomas Rast","fromEmail":"trast@student.ethz.ch","sentAt":"2010-05-21T09:48:08Z","receivedAt":"2010-05-21T09:48:08Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"tr@thomasrast.ch","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/153510?v=4"},"body":"Gary V. Vaughan wrote:\n> Git bug?  Or am I misunderstanding something?\n> \n> On 21 May 2010, at 07:00, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:\n> > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was\n> > generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing\n> > the project \"GNU Libtool\".\n> > \n> > The annotated tag, v2.2.7b has been created\n> >        at  13412c2e2dfe7a720483c8d1dc98ca21c13c0483 (tag)\n> >   tagging  99da5501fcca20d7cab7f328e223c7520c1a6701 (commit)\n> >  replaces  v2.2.6\n>    ^^^^^^^\n> > tagged by  Gary V. Vaughan\n> >        on  Fri May 21 06:26:53 2010 +0700\n> \n> This implies v2.2.6 tag was removed, and v2.2.7b was created in its place.\n> And yet in a freshly cloned tree I still see the v2.2.6 tag at commit\n> c7f97f395615fb62c96de30c6925484ecd0cee2e.  I'm running git version 1.6.6.1.\n\n>From a brief look at contrib/hooks/post-receive-email, this is merely\nthe nearest tag for 99da550^ (i.e., the \"previous\" tag before this)\ncombined with a poor choice of words.\n\n-- \nThomas Rast\ntrast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch\n"}]}