{"thread":{"id":"23706","subject":"[GSoC update] git-remote-svn: Week 1","startedAt":"2010-05-05T12:59:41Z","lastAt":"2010-05-10T08:29:40Z","messageCount":5,"participants":["Ramkumar Ramachandra","David Michael Barr"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"140980","messageId":"g2zf3271551005050559v2ea99346gcc59f941d634ce1a@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"23706","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"[GSoC update] git-remote-svn: Week 1","fromName":"Ramkumar Ramachandra","fromEmail":"artagnon@gmail.com","sentAt":"2010-05-05T12:59:41Z","receivedAt":"2010-05-05T12:59:41Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"r@artagnon.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/37226?v=4"},"body":"Hi,\n\nI'm sorry that this comes a couple of days late owing to the fact that\nI flew down the Copenhagen just a couple of days ago, and am coping\nwith the jetlag. I've just started working, and I'm currently\ninvestigating David's SVN exporter. Hopefully, after I've moved into\nan apartment, I'll have something concrete to show next week.\n\n-- Ram\n"},{"id":"141007","messageId":"90AEA593-35CC-403E-8918-94DB45BC0E06@cordelta.com","threadId":"23706","inReplyTo":"g2zf3271551005050559v2ea99346gcc59f941d634ce1a@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: [GSoC update] git-remote-svn: Week 1","fromName":"David Michael Barr","fromEmail":"david.barr@cordelta.com","sentAt":"2010-05-05T20:56:09Z","receivedAt":"2010-05-05T20:56:09Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"david.barr@cordelta.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/220594?v=4"},"body":"Hi Ram,\n\nA quick update. I've begun work on a reference exporter written in perl.\nI believe I introduced some regressions during code cleanup.\nFrom memory, the svn-dump-fast-export_0.8 tag has been verified for\n10,000 revisions of my repository.\nMy perl implementation works just fine until it reaches around 11,000\nrevisions at which point there's a memory explosion.\n\n-- David\n\nOn 05/05/2010, at 10:59 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:\n\n> Hi,\n> \n> I'm sorry that this comes a couple of days late owing to the fact that\n> I flew down the Copenhagen just a couple of days ago, and am coping\n> with the jetlag. I've just started working, and I'm currently\n> investigating David's SVN exporter. Hopefully, after I've moved into\n> an apartment, I'll have something concrete to show next week.\n> \n> -- Ram\n"},{"id":"141337","messageId":"o2pf3271551005091512qdebc006cic2c5b85ab7a9e23e@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"23706","inReplyTo":"90AEA593-35CC-403E-8918-94DB45BC0E06@cordelta.com","subject":"Re: [GSoC update] git-remote-svn: Week 1","fromName":"Ramkumar Ramachandra","fromEmail":"artagnon@gmail.com","sentAt":"2010-05-09T22:12:20Z","receivedAt":"2010-05-09T22:12:20Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"r@artagnon.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/37226?v=4"},"body":"Hi David,\n\n> A quick update. I've begun work on a reference exporter written in perl.\n\nCuriously, why?\n\n> I believe I introduced some regressions during code cleanup.\n> From memory, the svn-dump-fast-export_0.8 tag has been verified for\n> 10,000 revisions of my repository.\n\nThanks for the heads up. Don't worry about it though- I've started\ncleaning up the code. Will send you some patches off the list by\nemail, or whatever you prefer.\n\n-- Ram\n"},{"id":"141350","messageId":"66B5CC1B-044A-483E-88D2-DCB0785E3ABE@cordelta.com","threadId":"23706","inReplyTo":"o2pf3271551005091512qdebc006cic2c5b85ab7a9e23e@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: [GSoC update] git-remote-svn: Week 1","fromName":"David Michael Barr","fromEmail":"david.barr@cordelta.com","sentAt":"2010-05-10T07:08:46Z","receivedAt":"2010-05-10T07:08:46Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"david.barr@cordelta.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/220594?v=4"},"body":"Hi Ram,\n\nMy off-list reply was because I was still waking up.\n\n>> A quick update. I've begun work on a reference exporter written in perl.\n> \n> Curiously, why?\n\nI was working on a slow but reliable alternate implementation for\nvalidation and regression testing. So far, it seems really hard to write\nanything reliable atop Subversion.\n\n>> I believe I introduced some regressions during code cleanup.\n>> From memory, the svn-dump-fast-export_0.8 tag has been verified for\n>> 10,000 revisions of my repository.\n> \n> Thanks for the heads up. Don't worry about it though- I've started\n> cleaning up the code. Will send you some patches off the list by\n> email, or whatever you prefer.\n\nI know its bad form, but I've done what I promise is the last history\nmanipulation on my public repository. Now that the code is at a point\nthat is quite functional and ready to receive contributions, I've signed\noff on my own commits and reviewed the history.\nIts not yet '1.0' but hopefully Ram's eyeballing of the code will get us\nthere.\n\n--\nDavid Barr\n"},{"id":"141357","messageId":"i2gf3271551005100129s63b14129r5207cd177881c3ba@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"23706","inReplyTo":"66B5CC1B-044A-483E-88D2-DCB0785E3ABE@cordelta.com","subject":"Re: [GSoC update] git-remote-svn: Week 1","fromName":"Ramkumar Ramachandra","fromEmail":"artagnon@gmail.com","sentAt":"2010-05-10T08:29:40Z","receivedAt":"2010-05-10T08:29:40Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"r@artagnon.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/37226?v=4"},"body":"Hi David,\n\nOn Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:08 AM, David Michael Barr\n<david.barr@cordelta.com> wrote:\n> I was working on a slow but reliable alternate implementation for\n> validation and regression testing. So far, it seems really hard to write\n> anything reliable atop Subversion.\n\nOkay. I won't really touch that because I'm not very fluent in Perl.\n\n> I know its bad form, but I've done what I promise is the last history\n> manipulation on my public repository. Now that the code is at a point\n> that is quite functional and ready to receive contributions, I've signed\n> off on my own commits and reviewed the history.\n\nOn a related note, we might also want to benchmark it against\nalternatives and make the benchmarks public for the 1.0 release.\n\n> On that note, do you think I should rewrite my history to include\n> 'signed-off' or any other cleanup before I start accepting patches?\n\nYeah, I don't think we should have a problem with non-FF updates,\natleast until the project reaches 1.0 and becomes more public.\n\n-- Ram\n"}]}