{"thread":{"id":"2297","subject":"[PATCH 0/4] User-relative paths, take two.","startedAt":"2005-11-01T22:44:53Z","lastAt":"2005-11-01T22:44:53Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Andreas Ericsson"],"isPatch":true,"patchVersion":1,"patchTotal":4},"messages":[{"id":"10953","messageId":"4367EFE5.8070009@op5.se","threadId":"2297","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"[PATCH 0/4] User-relative paths, take two.","fromName":"Andreas Ericsson","fromEmail":"ae@op5.se","sentAt":"2005-11-01T22:44:53Z","receivedAt":"2005-11-01T22:44:53Z","isPatch":true,"sender":{"key":"ae@op5.se","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/426e89595c75a8f5252dd0c989e5fabe5bcac616e68557427ad9aef6b0ca342a?d=mp&s=160"},"body":"I've reworked the user-relative paths according to the discussion \"[RFC] \nGIT paths\" started by Junio. In addition I've added a '--strict-paths' \noption to git-daemon.\n\nI think I got everything right. At least it builds nicely and works as \nexpected.\n\nComments welcome. Upstream inclusion even more so. :)\n\nBtw. I'll have some more patches for git-daemon soon (--server-root and \n--userdir) which will rely on these patches making it in. Should I hold \noff on that for now?\n\n-- \nAndreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se\nOP5 AB                             www.op5.se\nTel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231\n"}]}