{"thread":{"id":"18603","subject":"[EGIT] How to deal with important modifications","startedAt":"2009-03-28T17:32:08Z","lastAt":"2009-03-30T04:30:09Z","messageCount":4,"participants":["Yann Simon","Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)","Robin Rosenberg","Shawn O. Pearce"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"109722","messageId":"1238261528.6971.10.camel@localhost","threadId":"18603","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"[EGIT] How to deal with important modifications","fromName":"Yann Simon","fromEmail":"yann.simon.fr@gmail.com","sentAt":"2009-03-28T17:32:08Z","receivedAt":"2009-03-28T17:32:08Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"yann.simon.fr@gmail.com","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/2d926895d27ac988c5c8e591887e5a6a4c7036390403c74fce92519119b887a0?d=mp&s=160"},"body":"Hi,\n\nI am working on the synchronization view. It is not 100% functional yet.\nThe view is not updated when a local file is modified for example.\nAs the modifications are getting important, I was wondering how to deal\nwith it. Should I continue my work an send all the patches when\nfinished?\n\nTo have an overview of the modifications:\nhttp://github.com/yanns/egit/commit/18c4a928d53345802a8c9641dcb2d457ebbe2cbc\nhttp://github.com/yanns/egit/commit/9fab398fa1b7b6efa9532b3c09e5bcfcc8bb9419\n\nOr should I begin to send patches, but by not activating the function\nyet?\n(It could be a way to have other people to help contributing.)\n\nYann\n"},{"id":"109737","messageId":"49CEA861.4070700@pelagic.nl","threadId":"18603","inReplyTo":"1238261528.6971.10.camel@localhost","subject":"Re: [EGIT] How to deal with important modifications","fromName":"Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)","fromEmail":"ferry.huberts@pelagic.nl","sentAt":"2009-03-28T22:44:49Z","receivedAt":"2009-03-28T22:44:49Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"ferry.huberts@pelagic.nl","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/9f63c0289ad23cbdef0f7609a0af85ff0f4b3babfd066de9ff58f62d48cfd6f2?d=mp&s=160"},"body":"Yann Simon wrote:\n> Hi,\n> \n> I am working on the synchronization view. It is not 100% functional yet.\n> The view is not updated when a local file is modified for example.\n> As the modifications are getting important, I was wondering how to deal\n> with it. Should I continue my work an send all the patches when\n> finished?\n> \n> To have an overview of the modifications:\n> http://github.com/yanns/egit/commit/18c4a928d53345802a8c9641dcb2d457ebbe2cbc\n> http://github.com/yanns/egit/commit/9fab398fa1b7b6efa9532b3c09e5bcfcc8bb9419\n> \n> Or should I begin to send patches, but by not activating the function\n> yet?\n> (It could be a way to have other people to help contributing.)\n> \n> Yann\nYann,\n\nI was asking myself the same questions about my work on ignores and\nchose to send it out early, being half completed. Don't know if that was\nright, did not receive feedback yet, but it's only been 2 days with\nEclipsecon wrapping up on friday.\n\nIf you keep a seperate changeset in which you activate your work and\nsplit up the changesets in manageable pieces it's easier for others to\nreview your work and comment on it.\n\nLove to see your work though. Having the sync view available for git\nwould be a major plus. I proposed something simpler on the wiki: a\n'pending changes' window. But if you have the complete sync view that's\nwonderful.\n\nmy 2 cents :-)\n\nFerry\n"},{"id":"109753","messageId":"200903291145.06135.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com","threadId":"18603","inReplyTo":"49CEA861.4070700@pelagic.nl","subject":"Re: [EGIT] How to deal with important modifications","fromName":"Robin Rosenberg","fromEmail":"robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com","sentAt":"2009-03-29T09:45:05Z","receivedAt":"2009-03-29T09:45:05Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"robin.rosenberg@dewire.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/46357?v=4"},"body":"lördag 28 mars 2009 23:44:49 skrev \"Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)\" :\n> Yann Simon wrote:\n> > Hi,\n> > \n> > I am working on the synchronization view. It is not 100% functional yet.\n> > The view is not updated when a local file is modified for example.\n> > As the modifications are getting important, I was wondering how to deal\n> > with it. Should I continue my work an send all the patches when\n> > finished?\n> > \n> > To have an overview of the modifications:\n> > http://github.com/yanns/egit/commit/18c4a928d53345802a8c9641dcb2d457ebbe2cbc\n> > http://github.com/yanns/egit/commit/9fab398fa1b7b6efa9532b3c09e5bcfcc8bb9419\n> > \n> > Or should I begin to send patches, but by not activating the function\n> > yet?\n> > (It could be a way to have other people to help contributing.)\n> > \n> > Yann\n> Yann,\n> \n> I was asking myself the same questions about my work on ignores and\n> chose to send it out early, being half completed. Don't know if that was\n> right, did not receive feedback yet, but it's only been 2 days with\n> Eclipsecon wrapping up on friday.\n\nThat's not the reason you haven't received a response. Basically, the larger\na set of patches is, more time is needed.\n\n> If you keep a seperate changeset in which you activate your work and\n> split up the changesets in manageable pieces it's easier for others to\n> review your work and comment on it.\n\nIndeed. Small patches can be reviewed more quickly if they introduce well\ndefined changes and especially good is if they make sense of their own.\n\nThink about how you would like the changes presented if you were to review\nthem without knowing anything in advance.\n\n-- robin\n"},{"id":"109812","messageId":"20090330043009.GT23521@spearce.org","threadId":"18603","inReplyTo":"200903291145.06135.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com","subject":"Re: [EGIT] How to deal with important modifications","fromName":"Shawn O. Pearce","fromEmail":"spearce@spearce.org","sentAt":"2009-03-30T04:30:09Z","receivedAt":"2009-03-30T04:30:09Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"spearce@spearce.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/34844?v=4"},"body":"Robin Rosenberg wrote:\n> l?rdag 28 mars 2009 23:44:49 skrev \"Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)\" :\n> > \n> > I was asking myself the same questions about my work on ignores and\n> > chose to send it out early, being half completed. Don't know if that was\n> > right, did not receive feedback yet, but it's only been 2 days with\n> > Eclipsecon wrapping up on friday.\n> \n> That's not the reason you haven't received a response. Basically, the larger\n> a set of patches is, more time is needed.\n\nYup.\n\nI plan to block off time to look at the patches tomorrow.\n\nThe bigger it is, the more likely it gets pushed off a few days,\nuntil I can block off a seemingly large enough amount of time to\ngive it a complete reading.\n \n-- \nShawn.\n"}]}