{"thread":{"id":"16826","subject":"Re: [PATCHv2] Have manpage reference new documentation on reverting merges.","startedAt":"2008-12-22T00:04:01Z","lastAt":"2008-12-22T00:04:01Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"98523","messageId":"200812211804.07486.bss@iguanasuicide.net","threadId":"16826","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Re: [PATCHv2] Have manpage reference new documentation on reverting merges.","fromName":"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.","fromEmail":"bss@iguanasuicide.net","sentAt":"2008-12-22T00:04:01Z","receivedAt":"2008-12-22T00:04:01Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"bss@iguanasuicide.net","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/84b95eeff194b816c1568b1339e63e4b229825298664a9037b9f1ec713ead1e3?d=mp&s=160"},"body":"On Sunday 2008 December 21 15:54:18 you wrote:\n> \"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.\" <bss@iguanasuicide.net> writes:\n> > I took the alternative approach.\n>\n> Thanks.  I was thinking about doing this instead; how the reference to the\n> HOW-TO is done is different, and I am hoping that it would give better\n> result for HTML version at least.\n\nI like the different link style (still learning asciidoc here), although I am \nmainly concerned with the manpage output.\n\nHowever, I intentionally avoided using the word \"branch\" in my prose, because \nthat implies (to me) that the ref is what is remembered and important.  \nThat's not technically correct, as refs are not part of the history that is \nconsidered during the later merge.\n-- \nBoyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. \nbss@iguanasuicide.net                     ((_/)o o(\\_))\nICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' \nhttp://iguanasuicide.net/                      \\_/     \n"}]}