{"thread":{"id":"15585","subject":"Re: [PATCH] Optional shrinking of RCS keywords in git-p4","startedAt":"2008-09-19T02:56:00Z","lastAt":"2008-09-19T02:56:00Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["dhruva"],"isPatch":true,"patchVersion":1,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"91086","messageId":"816161.55725.qm@web95003.mail.in2.yahoo.com","threadId":"15585","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Re: [PATCH] Optional shrinking of RCS keywords in git-p4","fromName":"dhruva","fromEmail":"dhruva@ymail.com","sentAt":"2008-09-19T02:56:00Z","receivedAt":"2008-09-19T02:56:00Z","isPatch":true,"sender":{"key":"dhruva@ymail.com","avatar":null},"body":"Hello,\n\n\n\n----- Original Message ----\n> From: dhruva <dhruva@ymail.com>\n> To: Jing Xue <jingxue@digizenstudio.com>; David Brown <git@davidb.org>\n> > \n> > How about collapsing the keywords in the _p4_ version after \"p4 edit\"\n> > but before applying the patch, and just \"p4 submit\" the collapsed\n> > version if patching succeeds? As pointed out earlier in this thread, p4\n> > submit doesn't care about whether keywords are expanded or not anyway.\n> \n> That is feasible but would require more changes. I still feel having an option \n> to disable the keyword from collapsing is a move forward followed by your \n> suggestion as a bug fix to fix the issue with 'p4 submit' when rcs keywords are \n> collapsed. Would that be an acceptable approach?\n> \n\n\nIf there are no more suggestions or objections, could we go ahead with patch? Personally, I would love to start seeing my small contributions getting into mainline and hence the shameless eagerness :)\n-dhruva\n\n\n      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/invite/\n"}]}