{"thread":{"id":"15086","subject":"Remote to a clone","startedAt":"2008-08-19T13:57:50Z","lastAt":"2008-08-19T13:57:50Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Alexander E Genaud"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"87694","messageId":"ee521d6f0808190657k720e584fs9763bd98fa685616@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"15086","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Remote to a clone","fromName":"Alexander E Genaud","fromEmail":"alex@genaud.net","sentAt":"2008-08-19T13:57:50Z","receivedAt":"2008-08-19T13:57:50Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"alex@genaud.net","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/046079bd0c4a3c04a9d0cdca66980d593471a7c3b13bed8c57e2c5b0aa56844b?d=mp&s=160"},"body":"Hi guys,\n\nI have cloned a ClearCase snapshot and am considering setting each to\nremote to the other. Is this a bad idea? How could it be done? The\nsnapshot will never have more than the master branch, while the clone\nwill have many.\n\nI've only cloned because switching between branches makes a mess of\nClearCase notion of changes and hijacks (mod dates and write bit) and\nresolving hijacks makes a bigger mess (.keep and .unloaded).\n\n-- \n[ alex@genaud.net ][ http://genaud.net ]\n[ B068 ED90 F47B 0965 2953 9FC3 EE9C C4D5 3E51 A207 ]\n"}]}