{"thread":{"id":"12903","subject":"[galtgendo@o2.pl: Re: Git vs svn. Is ... possible ?]","startedAt":"2008-03-28T14:34:49Z","lastAt":"2008-03-28T21:04:54Z","messageCount":3,"participants":["Rafał Mużyło","David Kastrup","Adam Piatyszek"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"73268","messageId":"20080328143449.GD32646@blackspire","threadId":"12903","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"[galtgendo@o2.pl: Re: Git vs svn. Is ... possible ?]","fromName":"Rafał Mużyło","fromEmail":"galtgendo@o2.pl","sentAt":"2008-03-28T14:34:49Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-28T14:34:49Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"galtgendo@o2.pl","avatar":null},"body":"----- Forwarded message from Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo@o2.pl> -----\n\nDate: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:15:36 +0100\nFrom: Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo@o2.pl>\nTo: Adam Piatyszek <ediap@users.sourceforge.net>\nSubject: Re: Git vs svn. Is ... possible ?\nMessage-ID: <20080328141536.GC32646@blackspire>\nReferences: <20080328132438.GA32646@blackspire>\n\t<47ECF459.2040500@users.sourceforge.net>\nMIME-Version: 1.0\nContent-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\nContent-Disposition: inline\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\nIn-Reply-To: <47ECF459.2040500@users.sourceforge.net>\nUser-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)\nStatus: RO\n\nOn Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 02:36:25PM +0100, Adam Piatyszek wrote:\n> Hi Rafał,\n>\n> * Rafa? Mu?y?o [28 III 2008 14:24]:\n>> Well, the actual question is:\n>> In svn I can do a remote diff (diff between two remote revisions) without\n>> having to do a checkout, is this possible for git ?\n>\n> The question makes no sense to me. Git by design is a distributed SCM tool, \n> so there is no such thing like \"remote revisions\". You can have tracking \n> branches (clones) of some remote repositories, but all the commits on such \n> branches are also stored locally. So you have full access to them, even \n> without a permanent connection to such remote repositories.\n>\nIt's a really simple question.\nFor svn I can do:\nsvn diff http:\\\\<svn path>@<rev. number 1>  http:\\\\<svn path>@<rev.\nnumber 2>\nCan I do the same for git, to avoid `git clone` ?\n\n>\n> PS. The encoding you used for your message is not playing well with the \n> Polish accented characters in your name ;)\nI think it's your mail program, which is not plaing well with received\nmail. My message was a standard, plain-text, UTF-8 encoded email sent by\nmutt.\n\n----- End forwarded message -----\n\nThis was meant to be sent to the list, not to a single user.\n"},{"id":"73269","messageId":"864paq3nz7.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz","threadId":"12903","inReplyTo":"20080328143449.GD32646@blackspire","subject":"Re: [galtgendo@o2.pl: Re: Git vs svn. Is ... possible ?]","fromName":"David Kastrup","fromEmail":"dak@gnu.org","sentAt":"2008-03-28T14:46:52Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-28T14:46:52Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"dak@gnu.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/52141349?v=4"},"body":"Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo@o2.pl> writes:\n\n> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 02:36:25PM +0100, Adam Piatyszek wrote:\n>>\n>> PS. The encoding you used for your message is not playing well with the \n>> Polish accented characters in your name ;)\n> I think it's your mail program, which is not plaing well with received\n> mail. My message was a standard, plain-text, UTF-8 encoded email sent by\n> mutt.\n\nActually, it wasn't.  The message body was only ASCII-encoded (which is\nperfectly fine as it did not contain any accented letter).  The From\nheader with your name, however, was properly MIME-encoded as utf-8.\n\nSo yes, it would seem like Adam's mail reader got into a tizzy when\ntrying to create the attribution line from the From header.\n\n-- \nDavid Kastrup\n"},{"id":"73290","messageId":"47ED5D76.6070101@users.sourceforge.net","threadId":"12903","inReplyTo":"864paq3nz7.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz","subject":"Re: [galtgendo@o2.pl: Re: Git vs svn. Is ... possible ?]","fromName":"Adam Piatyszek","fromEmail":"ediap@users.sourceforge.net","sentAt":"2008-03-28T21:04:54Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-28T21:04:54Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"ediap@users.sourceforge.net","avatar":null},"body":"* David Kastrup [28 III 2008 15:46]:\n> Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo@o2.pl> writes:\n>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 02:36:25PM +0100, Adam Piatyszek wrote:\n>>> PS. The encoding you used for your message is not playing well with the \n>>> Polish accented characters in your name ;)\n>> I think it's your mail program, which is not plaing well with received\n>> mail. My message was a standard, plain-text, UTF-8 encoded email sent by\n>> mutt.\n> \n> Actually, it wasn't.  The message body was only ASCII-encoded (which is\n> perfectly fine as it did not contain any accented letter).  The From\n> header with your name, however, was properly MIME-encoded as utf-8.\n> \n> So yes, it would seem like Adam's mail reader got into a tizzy when\n> trying to create the attribution line from the From header.\n\nYes. You are right. It seems that Thunderbird is not rfc2047-compliant \nin such a case. I guess I should submit a bug report ;)\n\nSorry for the noise!\n\n/Adam\n\n\n-- \n.:.  Adam Piatyszek (ediap)  .:.....................................:.\n.:.  ediap@users.sourceforge.net  .:................................:.\n"}]}