{"thread":{"id":"12847","subject":"[ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","startedAt":"2008-03-24T19:59:00Z","lastAt":"2008-03-27T00:03:59Z","messageCount":15,"participants":["Catalin Marinas","Jan Engelhardt","Rene Herman","Junio C Hamano","Josef Sipek","Johannes Schindelin"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"72941","messageId":"b0943d9e0803241259s5280cdc1o255a4412b3fa7bfc@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"[ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Catalin Marinas","fromEmail":"catalin.marinas@gmail.com","sentAt":"2008-03-24T19:59:00Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T19:59:00Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"catalin.marinas@gmail.com","avatar":null},"body":"Stacked GIT 0.14.2 release is available from http://www.procode.org/stgit/.\n\nStGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt\n(i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT. These\noperations are performed using GIT commands and the patches are stored\nas GIT commit objects, allowing easy merging of the StGIT patches into\nother repositories using standard GIT functionality.\n\nThis is a maintenance release including bug-fixes and a few user\ninterface enhancements. Acknowledgements:\n\nCatalin Marinas (13):\n Don't set the default authdate if none specified\n Allow pick to import multiple patches\n Check for unnecessary push/pop in 'float'\n Allow the synchronisation of the unapplied patches\n Modify 'series' to use '#' instead of '|'\n Set umask to 0022 during the setup.py execution\n Refuse to send empty patches\n Add a boundary to parse_patches in pick.py\n Fix sync to push the popped patches back after sync'ing\n Remove the reordering side-effect of the latter sync changes\n Allow picking of one commit id\n Remove a newline from the e-mail template\n Release 0.14.2\n\nOnno Kortmann (2):\n Simple rename of top-most patch\n Test the 'stg rename' command\n\nAlex Chiang (1):\n Better \"stg rebase\" help text\n\nAngus Salkeld (1):\n stg mail crashes when there is no patch description\n\nKarl Hasselström (1):\n Make documentation less confusing\n\nPeter Oberndorfer (1):\n replace \"git repo-config\" usage by \"git config\"\n\nToby Allsopp (1):\n Fix \"stg branch --delete\" on a nonexistent branch\n\n-- \nCatalin\n"},{"id":"72945","messageId":"alpine.LNX.1.10.0803242113070.9368@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"b0943d9e0803241259s5280cdc1o255a4412b3fa7bfc@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Jan Engelhardt","fromEmail":"jengelh@computergmbh.de","sentAt":"2008-03-24T20:15:06Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T20:15:06Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"jengelh@computergmbh.de","avatar":null},"body":"On Monday 2008-03-24 20:59, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n\n> Stacked GIT 0.14.2 release is available from http://www.procode.org/stgit/.\n>\n> StGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt\n> (i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT.\n\nI always wondered what the difference between stgit and guilt is.\nDoes anyone have a comparison up?\n"},{"id":"72948","messageId":"47E81037.5030808@keyaccess.nl","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"alpine.LNX.1.10.0803242113070.9368@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr","subject":"Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Rene Herman","fromEmail":"rene.herman@keyaccess.nl","sentAt":"2008-03-24T20:33:59Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T20:33:59Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"rene.herman@keyaccess.nl","avatar":null},"body":"On 24-03-08 21:15, Jan Engelhardt wrote:\n\n> On Monday 2008-03-24 20:59, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n> \n>> Stacked GIT 0.14.2 release is available from \n>> http://www.procode.org/stgit/.\n>>\n>> StGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt\n>> (i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT.\n> \n> I always wondered what the difference between stgit and guilt is.\n> Does anyone have a comparison up?\n\nAnd I remember some mumblings about git growing quilt-like functionality \nitself. Anything on that?\n\nRene.\n"},{"id":"72949","messageId":"7vlk47ua3v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"47E81037.5030808@keyaccess.nl","subject":"Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2008-03-24T20:43:00Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T20:43:00Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"Rene Herman writes:\n\n> On 24-03-08 21:15, Jan Engelhardt wrote:\n>\n>> On Monday 2008-03-24 20:59, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n>>\n>>> Stacked GIT 0.14.2 release is available from\n>>> http://www.procode.org/stgit/.\n>>>\n>>> StGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt\n>>> (i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT.\n>>\n>> I always wondered what the difference between stgit and guilt is.\n>> Does anyone have a comparison up?\n>\n> And I remember some mumblings about git growing quilt-like\n> functionality itself. Anything on that?\n\nNot my mumbling, but I am quite open to slurp in guilt as a subdirectory\nin git.git at some point in the future just like we bundle git-gui and\ngitk if asked by the maintainer.\n\nThe same applies to StGIT for that matter, although I somehow feel that is\nmuch less likely to happen, because it lived long enough as a standalone\nproject with enough following to achieve sustainable momentum by itself.\n"},{"id":"72963","messageId":"47E82BDD.9060507@keyaccess.nl","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"7vlk47ua3v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","subject":"Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Rene Herman","fromEmail":"rene.herman@keyaccess.nl","sentAt":"2008-03-24T22:31:57Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T22:31:57Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"rene.herman@keyaccess.nl","avatar":null},"body":"On 24-03-08 21:43, Junio C Hamano wrote:\n\n> Rene Herman writes:\n> \n>> On 24-03-08 21:15, Jan Engelhardt wrote:\n>>\n>>> On Monday 2008-03-24 20:59, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n>>>\n>>>> Stacked GIT 0.14.2 release is available from\n>>>> http://www.procode.org/stgit/.\n>>>>\n>>>> StGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt\n>>>> (i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT.\n>>> I always wondered what the difference between stgit and guilt is.\n>>> Does anyone have a comparison up?\n>> And I remember some mumblings about git growing quilt-like\n>> functionality itself. Anything on that?\n> \n> Not my mumbling\n\nBelieve it was Linus. Seem to remember him saying something about possibly \nadding a native queues-like interface not too long ago but it's proving \nimpossible to google for.\n\n> but I am quite open to slurp in guilt as a subdirectory in git.git at\n> some point in the future just like we bundle git-gui and gitk if asked by\n> the maintainer.\n> \n> The same applies to StGIT for that matter, although I somehow feel that\n> is much less likely to happen, because it lived long enough as a\n> standalone project with enough following to achieve sustainable momentum\n> by itself.\n\nRene.\n"},{"id":"72974","messageId":"b0943d9e0803241550k3ef0dbe8nae3b00bac34fa20@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"47E82BDD.9060507@keyaccess.nl","subject":"Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Catalin Marinas","fromEmail":"catalin.marinas@gmail.com","sentAt":"2008-03-24T22:50:49Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T22:50:49Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"catalin.marinas@gmail.com","avatar":null},"body":"On 24/03/2008, Rene Herman wrote:\n> On 24-03-08 21:43, Junio C Hamano wrote:\n>\n> > Rene Herman writes:\n> >\n> >> On 24-03-08 21:15, Jan Engelhardt wrote:\n> >>\n> >>> On Monday 2008-03-24 20:59, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n> >>>\n> >>>> Stacked GIT 0.14.2 release is available from\n> >>>> http://www.procode.org/stgit/.\n> >>>>\n> >>>> StGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt\n> >>>> (i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT.\n> >>> I always wondered what the difference between stgit and guilt is.\n> >>> Does anyone have a comparison up?\n> >> And I remember some mumblings about git growing quilt-like\n> >> functionality itself. Anything on that?\n> >\n> > Not my mumbling\n>\n>\n> Believe it was Linus. Seem to remember him saying something about possibly\n> adding a native queues-like interface not too long ago but it's proving\n> impossible to google for.\n\nIt was Linus indeed, on the linux-arch mailing list:\n\nhttp://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arch@vger.kernel.org/msg05012.html\n\n-- \nCatalin\n"},{"id":"72977","messageId":"47E837E8.7000606@keyaccess.nl","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"b0943d9e0803241550k3ef0dbe8nae3b00bac34fa20@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Rene Herman","fromEmail":"rene.herman@keyaccess.nl","sentAt":"2008-03-24T23:23:20Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T23:23:20Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"rene.herman@keyaccess.nl","avatar":null},"body":"On 24-03-08 23:50, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n\n> On 24/03/2008, Rene Herman wrote:\n>> On 24-03-08 21:43, Junio C Hamano wrote:\n\n>> >> On 24-03-08 21:15, Jan Engelhardt wrote:\n\n>> >>> I always wondered what the difference between stgit and guilt is.\n>> >>> Does anyone have a comparison up?\n>> >> And I remember some mumblings about git growing quilt-like\n>> >> functionality itself. Anything on that?\n>> >\n>> > Not my mumbling\n>>\n>>\n>> Believe it was Linus. Seem to remember him saying something about possibly\n>> adding a native queues-like interface not too long ago but it's proving\n>> impossible to google for.\n> \n> It was Linus indeed, on the linux-arch mailing list:\n> \n> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arch@vger.kernel.org/msg05012.html\n\nProbably read it on linux-kernel but yes, that was the one, thanks much. \nStored it as an interesting something -- used to use quilt and although I \ndidn't much care for its linear nature when managing an entire tree, it \nprobably works out well for private topic branches. Not overly sure of added \npractical value over git rebase, but I did like the simple nature of \nshuffling things around by just editing a series file back when I was using \nquilt. Keeps one on top of things, so to speak (<-- amusing play on words).\n\nMoreover not too keen on using many tools do do one thing, so getting this \ninside git itself sounded like a possibly nice notion.\n\nRene.\n"},{"id":"72978","messageId":"b0943d9e0803241624ne83602emc1fb4727402555d3@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"alpine.LNX.1.10.0803242113070.9368@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr","subject":"Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Catalin Marinas","fromEmail":"catalin.marinas@gmail.com","sentAt":"2008-03-24T23:24:20Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T23:24:20Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"catalin.marinas@gmail.com","avatar":null},"body":"On 24/03/2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:\n> On Monday 2008-03-24 20:59, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n>\n> > Stacked GIT 0.14.2 release is available from http://www.procode.org/stgit/.\n> >\n> > StGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt\n> > (i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT.\n>\n>\n> I always wondered what the difference between stgit and guilt is.\n> Does anyone have a comparison up?\n\nThere was a thread last year:\n\nhttp://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2007/6/14/249310\n\nI don't follow the guilt development to be able to comment. They are\npretty similar regarding patch management but it's probably best to\ntry both and see which tool you like. StGIT might have a few more\nfeatures as it was around for longer (e-mail templates, patch\nsynchronisation between branches etc.) but guilt seems actively\ndeveloped as well.\n\nI might be wrong here but I'm not sure whether guilt uses three-way\nmerging when pushing a patch or just a two-way diff apply. The\nthree-way merging has several advantages in dealing with conflicts.\n\n-- \nCatalin\n"},{"id":"72981","messageId":"20080324233952.GD32221@josefsipek.net","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"b0943d9e0803241624ne83602emc1fb4727402555d3@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Josef Sipek","fromEmail":"jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu","sentAt":"2008-03-24T23:39:52Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T23:39:52Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu","avatar":null},"body":"On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:24:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n> On 24/03/2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:\n> > On Monday 2008-03-24 20:59, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n> >\n> > > Stacked GIT 0.14.2 release is available from http://www.procode.org/stgit/.\n> > >\n> > > StGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt\n> > > (i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT.\n> >\n> >\n> > I always wondered what the difference between stgit and guilt is.\n> > Does anyone have a comparison up?\n> \n> There was a thread last year:\n> \n> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2007/6/14/249310\n> \n> I don't follow the guilt development to be able to comment. They are\n> pretty similar regarding patch management but it's probably best to\n> try both and see which tool you like. StGIT might have a few more\n> features as it was around for longer (e-mail templates, patch\n> synchronisation between branches etc.) but guilt seems actively\n> developed as well.\n \nRight. Try both and use whatever you're happier with.\n\n> I might be wrong here but I'm not sure whether guilt uses three-way\n> merging when pushing a patch or just a two-way diff apply. The\n> three-way merging has several advantages in dealing with conflicts.\n\nIt's still using two-way diff apply, but I'd like to implement a three-way\nmerge as a fallback.\n\nJosef 'Jeff' Sipek.\n\n-- \nThe box said \"Windows XP or better required\". So I installed Linux.\n"},{"id":"72980","messageId":"b0943d9e0803241640h500e43ffgee55bb9e1b2b04e2@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"47E837E8.7000606@keyaccess.nl","subject":"Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Catalin Marinas","fromEmail":"catalin.marinas@gmail.com","sentAt":"2008-03-24T23:40:04Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T23:40:04Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"catalin.marinas@gmail.com","avatar":null},"body":"On 24/03/2008, Rene Herman wrote:\n> used to use quilt and although I\n> didn't much care for its linear nature when managing an entire tree, it\n> probably works out well for private topic branches. Not overly sure of added\n> practical value over git rebase, but I did like the simple nature of\n> shuffling things around by just editing a series file back when I was using\n> quilt. Keeps one on top of things, so to speak (<-- amusing play on words).\n\nGit rebasing is useful but using a patch management tool is much\neasier, especially when you need to post a series of patches multiple\ntimes while implementing others' comments. And this is not only for\nprivate branches but public ones that are meant for upstream merging.\nThe problem with these tools is that they rewrite the history of the\nrepository but they are OK if you aren't in a position where people\nneed to base their work on your tree.\n\nI would much prefer to simply commit the additional comments at the\ntop of a branch without changing the history but this makes patch\nposting and reviewing more difficult. Because of this requirement to\nkeep clean patches (which I think is fair), people using maintainers'\nbranches can only use rebasing (or some patch management tool).\n\n> Moreover not too keen on using many tools do do one thing, so getting this\n> inside git itself sounded like a possibly nice notion.\n\nI don't like using many tools either, hence I use mostly StGIT :-).\n\n-- \nCatalin\n"},{"id":"72984","messageId":"20080324235534.GE32221@josefsipek.net","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"7vlk47ua3v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","subject":"Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Josef Sipek","fromEmail":"jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu","sentAt":"2008-03-24T23:55:34Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T23:55:34Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu","avatar":null},"body":"On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 01:43:00PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:\n> Rene Herman writes:\n> \n> > On 24-03-08 21:15, Jan Engelhardt wrote:\n> >\n> >> On Monday 2008-03-24 20:59, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n> >>\n> >>> Stacked GIT 0.14.2 release is available from\n> >>> http://www.procode.org/stgit/.\n> >>>\n> >>> StGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt\n> >>> (i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT.\n> >>\n> >> I always wondered what the difference between stgit and guilt is.\n> >> Does anyone have a comparison up?\n> >\n> > And I remember some mumblings about git growing quilt-like\n> > functionality itself. Anything on that?\n> \n> Not my mumbling, but I am quite open to slurp in guilt as a subdirectory\n> in git.git at some point in the future just like we bundle git-gui and\n> gitk if asked by the maintainer.\n \nJunio,\n\nThat'd be great! Is there anything special you want me to do? Well, I want\nto finish up a merge I've been working on first.\n\nJosef 'Jeff' Sipek.\n\n-- \nOnce you have their hardware. Never give it back.\n(The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)\n"},{"id":"72983","messageId":"b0943d9e0803241655s7a7fea9cvcd3c162253e49625@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"7vlk47ua3v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","subject":"Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Catalin Marinas","fromEmail":"catalin.marinas@gmail.com","sentAt":"2008-03-24T23:55:39Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-24T23:55:39Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"catalin.marinas@gmail.com","avatar":null},"body":"On 24/03/2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:\n> Rene Herman writes:\n> > And I remember some mumblings about git growing quilt-like\n> > functionality itself. Anything on that?\n>\n>\n> Not my mumbling, but I am quite open to slurp in guilt as a subdirectory\n> in git.git at some point in the future just like we bundle git-gui and\n> gitk if asked by the maintainer.\n>\n> The same applies to StGIT for that matter, although I somehow feel that is\n> much less likely to happen, because it lived long enough as a standalone\n> project with enough following to achieve sustainable momentum by itself.\n\nIndeed, StGIT has grown quite a lot (it now has ~45 commands) and it\nprobably feels better as a tool on its own. However, I think it would\nbe good for git to get such functionality (and it could even share\nsome ideas StGIT and guilt). If this functionality will get fully\nintegrated in git, StGIT could use it directly rather than the\nlow-level git commands.\n\nAn example of additional functionality that might stay outside of git\n(at least for a while): since basic patch management support is pretty\nmuch complete in StGIT, a feature we are thinking about adding is\nbetter support for patch sharing between developers (or\nrepositories/branches). This should allow easier cloning and merging\nwith branches that have a volatile history at the top.\n\n-- \nCatalin\n"},{"id":"73018","messageId":"alpine.LSU.1.00.0803251048320.10660@wbgn129.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"20080324235534.GE32221@josefsipek.net","subject":"slurping in guilt, was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Johannes Schindelin","fromEmail":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","sentAt":"2008-03-25T09:50:20Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-25T09:50:20Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/127790?v=4"},"body":"Hi,\n\n[cutting down the Cc: list to the most-likely-interested parties]\n\nOn Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Josef Sipek wrote:\n\n> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 01:43:00PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:\n>\n> > Not my mumbling, but I am quite open to slurp in guilt as a \n> > subdirectory in git.git at some point in the future just like we \n> > bundle git-gui and gitk if asked by the maintainer.\n>\n> That'd be great! Is there anything special you want me to do? Well, I \n> want to finish up a merge I've been working on first.\n\nWould it not be more appropriate to slurp it in as a subproject? But then \nthe same grace period as for git-gui and gitk would apply, since we still \nexpect some users not to have a submodule capable git...\n\nCiao,\nDscho\n"},{"id":"73167","messageId":"7v1w5xch6h.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"alpine.LSU.1.00.0803251048320.10660@wbgn129.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de","subject":"Re: slurping in guilt, was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2008-03-26T21:24:22Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-26T21:24:22Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"Johannes Schindelin writes:\n\n> [cutting down the Cc: list to the most-likely-interested parties]\n>\n> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Josef Sipek wrote:\n>\n>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 01:43:00PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:\n>>\n>> > Not my mumbling, but I am quite open to slurp in guilt as a \n>> > subdirectory in git.git at some point in the future just like we \n>> > bundle git-gui and gitk if asked by the maintainer.\n>>\n>> That'd be great! Is there anything special you want me to do? Well, I \n>> want to finish up a merge I've been working on first.\n>\n> Would it not be more appropriate to slurp it in as a subproject? But then \n> the same grace period as for git-gui and gitk would apply, since we still \n> expect some users not to have a submodule capable git...\n\nAll true. On the other hand we could start with a subtree merge and later\nswitch.\n\nIn any case, the answer to Josef's question is to make sure I won't hear\nobjections on the list that say \"No, the stuff is still too premature to\nlive in git.git itself and needs this and that fixups to be usable for the\ngeneral public.\" ;-) IOW, keep up the good work. Gathering a bit more\nfollowers, preferably outside this mailing list (such as wine, x.org\nand/or the kernel community), would not hurt.\n"},{"id":"73173","messageId":"20080327000359.GA24097@josefsipek.net","threadId":"12847","inReplyTo":"7v1w5xch6h.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","subject":"Re: slurping in guilt, was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2","fromName":"Josef Sipek","fromEmail":"jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu","sentAt":"2008-03-27T00:03:59Z","receivedAt":"2008-03-27T00:03:59Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu","avatar":null},"body":"On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 02:24:22PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:\n... \n> In any case, the answer to Josef's question is to make sure I won't hear\n> objections on the list that say \"No, the stuff is still too premature to\n> live in git.git itself and needs this and that fixups to be usable for the\n> general public.\" ;-) IOW, keep up the good work.\n\nGreat...of course _I_ know all the things in guilt that _I_ would like to\nsee changed (the maintainer syndrome?). :)\n\n> Gathering a bit more followers, preferably outside this mailing list (such\n> as wine, x.org and/or the kernel community), would not hurt.\n\nThe git mailing list is interesting because it tends to have people from all\nthe other projects as well. From the looks of things, Guilt seems to have a\npretty strong following the Linux filesystem area.\n\nIf things go well, I'll be able to go to OLS and have a BoF session about\nGuilt (already got an Ok from the conference folks, it's just a matter of\nfiguring out travel/hotel).\n\nOverall, sounds like a plan.\n\nJosef 'Jeff' Sipek.\n\n-- \nFailure is not an option,\nIt comes bundled with your Microsoft product.\n"}]}