{"thread":{"id":"10763","subject":"cogito remote branch","startedAt":"2007-11-09T13:16:47Z","lastAt":"2007-11-10T11:52:39Z","messageCount":8,"participants":["MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de","Andreas Ericsson","Johannes Schindelin","Jon Loeliger","Michael Dressel","Jakub Narebski"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"59038","messageId":"1IqTj5-24rt3I0@fwd33.aul.t-online.de","threadId":"10763","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"cogito remote branch","fromName":"MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de","fromEmail":"michaeltilodressel@t-online.de","sentAt":"2007-11-09T13:16:47Z","receivedAt":"2007-11-09T13:16:47Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"michaeltilodressel@t-online.de","avatar":null},"body":"Hi,\n\nI just saw the scripts cg-update, cg-push ..  scripts try to guess a\nbranch name functioning as origin if no argument is given. These scripts\nseam to use a branch named <branchname>-origin if it exists and the\ncurrent\nbranch is named <branchname> and is not the branch named master.\n\nI like that feature. Is it anywhere documented?\n\nIn case there is no branch named <branchname>-origin the scripts just\nuse origin even if the current branch is not master. I would prefer the\nscripts to fail in this case and to print a message asking the user to\nspecifically name a branch.\n\nCheers,\nMichael\n"},{"id":"59039","messageId":"47345E85.8090702@op5.se","threadId":"10763","inReplyTo":"1IqTj5-24rt3I0@fwd33.aul.t-online.de","subject":"Re: cogito remote branch","fromName":"Andreas Ericsson","fromEmail":"ae@op5.se","sentAt":"2007-11-09T13:20:05Z","receivedAt":"2007-11-09T13:20:05Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"ae@op5.se","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/426e89595c75a8f5252dd0c989e5fabe5bcac616e68557427ad9aef6b0ca342a?d=mp&s=160"},"body":"MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de wrote:\n> Hi,\n> \n> I just saw the scripts cg-update, cg-push ..  scripts try to guess a\n> branch name functioning as origin if no argument is given. These scripts\n> seam to use a branch named <branchname>-origin if it exists and the\n> current\n> branch is named <branchname> and is not the branch named master.\n> \n> I like that feature. Is it anywhere documented?\n> \n> In case there is no branch named <branchname>-origin the scripts just\n> use origin even if the current branch is not master. I would prefer the\n> scripts to fail in this case and to print a message asking the user to\n> specifically name a branch.\n> \n\nCogito is deprecated, and has been for quite some time. The \"remote\"\nfeature of core git (inspired by cogito) offers similar benefits.\n\n-- \nAndreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se\nOP5 AB                             www.op5.se\nTel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231\n"},{"id":"59046","messageId":"1IqUGN-1XXOVs0@fwd33.aul.t-online.de","threadId":"10763","inReplyTo":"47345E85.8090702@op5.se","subject":"Re: cogito remote branch","fromName":"MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de","fromEmail":"michaeltilodressel@t-online.de","sentAt":"2007-11-09T13:51:11Z","receivedAt":"2007-11-09T13:51:11Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"michaeltilodressel@t-online.de","avatar":null},"body":"\nSuch a pity.  We just got used to it.\n\n-----Original Message-----\nDate: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:20:05 +0100\nSubject: Re: cogito remote branch\nFrom: Andreas Ericsson \nTo: \"MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de\" \n\nMichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de wrote:\n> Hi,\n> \n> I just saw the scripts cg-update, cg-push ..  scripts try to guess a\n> branch name functioning as origin if no argument is given. These\nscripts\n> seam to use a branch named -origin if it exists and the\n> current\n> branch is named  and is not the branch named master.\n> \n> I like that feature. Is it anywhere documented?\n> \n> In case there is no branch named -origin the scripts just\n> use origin even if the current branch is not master. I would prefer\nthe\n> scripts to fail in this case and to print a message asking the user to\n> specifically name a branch.\n> \n\nCogito is deprecated, and has been for quite some time. The \"remote\"\nfeature of core git (inspired by cogito) offers similar benefits.\n\n-- \nAndreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se\nOP5 AB                             www.op5.se\nTel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231\n"},{"id":"59049","messageId":"Pine.LNX.4.64.0711091417060.4362@racer.site","threadId":"10763","inReplyTo":"1IqUGN-1XXOVs0@fwd33.aul.t-online.de","subject":"Re: cogito remote branch","fromName":"Johannes Schindelin","fromEmail":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","sentAt":"2007-11-09T14:17:26Z","receivedAt":"2007-11-09T14:17:26Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/127790?v=4"},"body":"Hi,\n\nOn Fri, 9 Nov 2007, MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de wrote:\n\n> Such a pity.  We just got used to it.\n\nIt's open source.  You are free to use/maintain it.\n\nCiao,\nDscho\n"},{"id":"59073","messageId":"1IqWRW-0QQ4LA0@fwd26.aul.t-online.de","threadId":"10763","inReplyTo":"Pine.LNX.4.64.0711091417060.4362@racer.site","subject":"Re: cogito remote branch","fromName":"MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de","fromEmail":"michaeltilodressel@t-online.de","sentAt":"2007-11-09T16:10:50Z","receivedAt":"2007-11-09T16:10:50Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"michaeltilodressel@t-online.de","avatar":null},"body":"\n\n>> Such a pity.  We just got used to it.\n\n>t's open source.  You are free to use/maintain it.\n\nTrue. But I'm not sure if it would be worth the effort. \nI don't mind using git directly. There are just some features\nwhich simplify things for me in cogito. E.g. in cogito in the simplest\nway you don't need to be aware of the index. While with git\nyou have to remember to add the changes to the index explicitly\nto get them committed. \n\nCheers,\nMichael\n"},{"id":"59079","messageId":"1194625691.1471.3.camel@ld0161-tx32","threadId":"10763","inReplyTo":"1IqWRW-0QQ4LA0@fwd26.aul.t-online.de","subject":"Re: cogito remote branch","fromName":"Jon Loeliger","fromEmail":"jdl@freescale.com","sentAt":"2007-11-09T16:28:11Z","receivedAt":"2007-11-09T16:28:11Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"jdl@jdl.com","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/75ce9a10b151acd2c28ec4ab2136dba7b2ff1634530bd04b155981a749d08a64?d=mp&s=160"},"body":"On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 10:10, MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de wrote:\n>  There are just some features\n> which simplify things for me in cogito. E.g. in cogito in the simplest\n> way you don't need to be aware of the index. While with git\n> you have to remember to add the changes to the index explicitly\n> to get them committed. \n> \n> Cheers,\n> Michael\n\n\"git commit -a ...\" might be useful for you.\n\nOther lingering cogito-isms you think are lacking in git?\n\njdl\n"},{"id":"59198","messageId":"Pine.LNX.4.64.0711101217130.4330@castor.milkiway.cos","threadId":"10763","inReplyTo":"1194625691.1471.3.camel@ld0161-tx32","subject":"Re: cogito remote branch","fromName":"Michael Dressel","fromEmail":"michaeltilodressel@t-online.de","sentAt":"2007-11-10T11:27:08Z","receivedAt":"2007-11-10T11:27:08Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"michaeltilodressel@t-online.de","avatar":null},"body":"\n\nOn Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Jon Loeliger wrote:\n\n> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 10:10, MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de wrote:\n> >  There are just some features\n> > which simplify things for me in cogito. E.g. in cogito in the simplest\n> > way you don't need to be aware of the index. While with git\n> > you have to remember to add the changes to the index explicitly\n> > to get them committed. \n> > \n> > Cheers,\n> > Michael\n> \n> \"git commit -a ...\" might be useful for you.\n> \n> Other lingering cogito-isms you think are lacking in git?\n\nThanks for the hint. I have to use git for a while to understand what may \nstill be lacking (at least for me, if at all). Off the top of my head one \nother difference is that if I do a cg-push the remote (or origin) head is \nupdated automatically, I think.\n\nCheers,\nMichael \n"},{"id":"59199","messageId":"fh4627$men$1@ger.gmane.org","threadId":"10763","inReplyTo":"Pine.LNX.4.64.0711101217130.4330@castor.milkiway.cos","subject":"Re: cogito remote branch","fromName":"Jakub Narebski","fromEmail":"jnareb@gmail.com","sentAt":"2007-11-10T11:52:39Z","receivedAt":"2007-11-10T11:52:39Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"jnareb@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2706?v=4"},"body":"Michael Dressel wrote:\n> On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Jon Loeliger wrote: \n>> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 10:10, MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de wrote:\n>>\n>>>  There are just some features\n>>> which simplify things for me in cogito. E.g. in cogito in the simplest\n>>> way you don't need to be aware of the index. While with git\n>>> you have to remember to add the changes to the index explicitly\n>>> to get them committed. \n>> \n>> \"git commit -a ...\" might be useful for you.\n>> \n>> Other lingering cogito-isms you think are lacking in git?\n> \n> Thanks for the hint. I have to use git for a while to understand what may \n> still be lacking (at least for me, if at all). Off the top of my head one \n> other difference is that if I do a cg-push the remote (or origin) head is \n> updated automatically, I think.\n\nIf you mean that tracking branches are updated on push, this is what\ngit also does from some time (perhaps not in released version, so please\nwait or run 'master').\n\n-- \nJakub Narebski\nWarsaw, Poland\nShadeHawk on #git\n"}]}