{"thread":{"id":"10598","subject":"Re: [PATCH] New script: git-changelog.perl","startedAt":"2007-11-02T19:18:02Z","lastAt":"2007-11-02T19:18:02Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Jakub Narebski"],"isPatch":true,"patchVersion":1,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"58022","messageId":"200711022018.02926.jnareb@gmail.com","threadId":"10598","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"Re: [PATCH] New script: git-changelog.perl","fromName":"Jakub Narebski","fromEmail":"jnareb@gmail.com","sentAt":"2007-11-02T19:18:02Z","receivedAt":"2007-11-02T19:18:02Z","isPatch":true,"sender":{"key":"jnareb@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2706?v=4"},"body":"Subject: Re: [PATCH] New script: git-changelog.perl\nFrom: \"Ronald Landheer-Cieslak\" \nTo: \"Jakub Narebski\" \n\nOn Nov 2, 2007 1:07 PM, Jakub Narebski wrote:\n> [Cc: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak ,\n> git@vger.kernel.org]\n>\n> Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:\n>\n>> I've written a little script that will format the changes as reported\n>> by git-log in a ChangeLog-like format. Entries look like this:\n>> \\t\\n\\t: \n>\n> How it compares to existing git2cl tool?:\n> http://josefsson.org/git2cl/\n> http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/InterfacesFrontendsAndTools\n\nI must admit I didn't know about git2cl. The first difference I see is\nthat it's simpler and has less dependencies: my script doesn't use any\nexternal modules (e.g. it doesn't parse the date) but just parses a\nformatted output from git-log.\n\nOther than that, there's not much difference: my output is a bit\nsparser and my script invokes the proper git-log command by itself, so\nyou don't have to pipe through it (i.e. all you do is git-changelog >\nChangeLog to get your change log) but that's pretty much it.\n\nIf you want, you can have a look at it at\ngit://vlinder.landheer-cieslak.com/git/git.git#topic/git-log-changelog\n\nrlc\n\n-- \nRonald Landheer-Cieslak\nSoftware Architect\nhttp://www.landheer-cieslak.com/\nNew White Paper: \"Three Good Reasons to Plan Ahead\"\n"}]}